This is just a meme right? It's not true but I kind of want it to be

We can't ever catch a break from those demons bros..

>>82048694 (OP)
So basically, women have mind rape chemicals. Hot

>>82048694 (OP)
This would require one to be in direct contact with a vagina thoughbeit.

>>82048694 (OP)
I don't think this is real but it's true the other way around (what chad semen does to women)

>>82048867
no copulins are very real wdym

I volunteer myself for coupling
It will need to be an ongoing daily regimen so as to make sure my mind is fully subdued at all times

>>82048694 (OP)
Thanks for sharing this. The image presents a sensational and conspiratorial claim that women's vaginal secretions (specifically "copulins") can chemically mind-control men--changing their memories, planting thoughts, or forcing behavior. Let's break this down with real science:

>> What are copulins?
- Copulins are indeed a class of volatile fatty acids found in vaginal secretions, especially during ovulation.
- Studies (e.g. Jutte et al., 1978) found that copulins can slightly increase men's perceptions of women's attractiveness or sexual availability.
- However, copulins are not mind-control chemicals; they have only subtle, unconscious influences similar to other pheromones seen in animals.

>> Debunking the specific claims in the image:
>1. Memory manipulation, planting thoughts, or controling senses?
- False. There's no scientific evidence that copulins--or any human pheromone--can alter a person's memories, perceptions, or implant subconscious commands. Such effects would require pharmacologically active compounds targeting the brain directly, not faint odors.
>2. "Up to 1/2 cup (100 ml) of copulins injected into the urethra"?
- Absurd. The vagina does not inject fluid into the penis during intercourse, nor does the female reproductive system produce such volumes of copulin. 100 ml is a massive amount (About half a small soda can)--biologically impossible.
>3. Entering the bloodstream and altering the hypothalamus?
- Baseless. Even if copulins were absorbed, they would be broken down long before reaching the brain. There's no mechanism for pheromones to travel this way to hijack the hypothalamus.
>4. Copulins "forcing males to become obedient or addicted"?
- No evidence. Copulins might subconsciously influence attraction or arousal, but not decision-making or complex behaviors. The idea of "mental weakening" or "control" is a conspiracy myth.

part 1 of 2.

>>82048694 (OP)
>random fucking molecules (phenylacetic acid??)
>random incorrectly used scientific jargon
just a reminder that this board has consistently tested as the lowest IQ board and it shows

>>82049309
>>82048694 (OP)
part 2 of 2

>5. Citations of Karl Grammer and Elizabeth Oberzaucher?
- These researchers did study how ovulation cues affect attraction, but not mind control. They never claimed copulins grant women control over men's thoughts or actions.
>6. Historical anecdotes (emperors kept concubines due to copulins)?
- Pure speculation. While powerful men had harems, it's a stretch to blame it on vaginal secretions. Social, political, and cultural factors explain those practices.

>> What's real?
- Ovulating women may smell slightly different due to subtle changes in vaginal secretions.
- Some studies show men exposed to these scents can rate women as more attractive or feel slightly more aroused.
- These effects are small, subconscious, and nowhere near mind control.

>> Bottom Line:
This article in your image is PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC MISINFORMATION. It mixes a kernal of truth (pheromones exist) with dramatic, false claims about extreme psychological and physiological effects. There's no scientific basis for the idea that copulins--or any vaginal fluid--can forcibly control, addict, or reprogram a man's brain.

>>82049309
>>82049374
thanks for putting a trip on so i can filter your ai spam

>>82049384
mald harder swallow some buckshot little faggot cuckold retard

>>82049404
seethe ai nigger

>>82049384
>>82049418
anon you are a retarded cuck and anyone with a 9th grade science education and see that, >>82049364 no ai needed

>>82049426
>>82049426
>Thanks for sharing this. The image presents a sensational and conspiratorial claim that women's vaginal secretions
this is literally what ai responds with when you prompt it with an image and question. it's a good thing you brought up people here being low iq since you fit in so well.

>>82048694 (OP)
this is the most interesting way of presenting fetish content i have ever seen.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704916643328
Here is an actual study on it. It shows (among multiple other redpills) that couplins do make men hornier and find women more attractive, but they are VERY FAR from actual mind control.

This study's intro also links to several other studies about how women want chad when ovulating (or any man with good physical genes, unsure if intelligence plays a factor)

>>82049418
I debunked you though

I won

its so hilarious how much you're seething you retarded little faggot LOL!

>>82049309
>>82049374
stop ruining the thread.

>>82049439
does this >>82049364 sound like ai nigger?

>>82049540
Intelligence is not a considered factor. In fact the genes that toilets most commonly select for are the opposite of intelligence. There's a study on it.

>>82049545
>I debunked you
no? you're not the ai, and I am not op.

>>82049599
I don't care if what you posted sounds like ai because I wasn't talking to you lmao. are you fucking dense?

>>82049603
good. intelligent people should breed other intelligent people

>>82049611
you replied to me twice. are you fucking dense?

>>82049618
after you replied to my replies to the ai spam. just how fucking stupid are you? can you not follow a fucking simple conversation? my replies were DIRECTLY meant for the ai faggot.

>>82049603
this is one of the reasons modern society might lead to a long-term downfall of humanity

in the caveman era intelligence was highly necessary, and natural selection led to it becoming a thing, not women's preferences. A world full of retards is conducive to more retards, especially when most intelligent people forgo kids due to hard jobs.

>>82049663
high IQ people select for IQ tho
that means we will eventually have a caste of super retards and super smarts

>tfw no mind controlling gf

Kek @ OP seething at chatgpt for tearing apart his goon fantasy

>>82050024
So far I've posted in this thread twice
Pic is you btw