To most girls, either the sex needs to be extremely rough, dominating, and often kinky in weird ways, or it can be gentle and "loving" but in a weird exaggerated romance novel way where the guy still takes control (just less violently) and talks like some fictional prince charming with very stilted and flowery language (often also weirdly infantilizing towards the girl in an affectionate way) who can read the girl's mind and do things in a very showy way. Or the third way of "she just lies back and has a dick stuck in her for 30 seconds because she doesn't even like sex at all and just puts up with it to please her man" of course. So either its intimate but also extremely emotional in a weird way or its casual to the point of being totally transactional and emotionless

I like the idea of something different, where emotionally intimate and nice but also more mundane, like we'd get home from work and take some time where we cuddle naked and I just finger her for a while, while we talk about our days or our feelings or anything else on our mind, being close together but in a much more "normal" way imo. But most girls seem to either view that sort of thing as basically the same as "silent missionary in the dark for 30 seconds" or instead view it as some sort of kink that is way weirder than something more "normal" (in the eyes of girls) like a guy pretending to be her father while she pretends to be a child, and then pretending to rape her

And I just don't get it, idk why girls have to be so fucking weird about sex

>>82050514 (OP)
Loving and exaggerated romantic sex sounds nice, wish I could do that with a girl.

>>82050526
It sounds better than the chad style sex but still sounds worse than sex where you can be loving and romantic without doing some sort of exaggerated performance