To Women,

I resent you. You're not really listening, and you're not making the changes you need to. You're the only one who doesn't recognize a cataclysm incoming. Even corpos recognize how bankrupt your credibility is and how serious the situation is spiraling out of control and you just fucking can't.

Anon

>Last Thread:
>>82080826

>>82092570 (OP)
haiii nonny
respond to me plsss I love ur posts

>>82092570 (OP)
>Even corpos recognize how bankrupt your credibility is
In what way? How?

>>82092730
I'm not here to answer your questions, think for yourself, disagree if you want, go looking for the answer if you want to be sure, but the last thing I want to do i spoonfeed you what to think. Agree, or disagree, the choice is yours. Any evidence i could provide for you would just be biased. Go see for yourself, or call me wrong if you wish.

>>82092570 (OP)
Is this really you, resent anon? You don't usually use this picture.... I guess I'll take your word for it.

Sorry about what has happened to you. You didn't really touch on it in this post, but it seems like you and others have been severely mistreated by women. I'm sorry, hopefully you'll be okay.
I know mistreatment can stay with you for a long time, hopefully it doesn't get to you too much.

Anyway, who exactly are these posts addressed to? If anyone? Or is it just a general, not addressed to anyone, vent?

>>82093033
>Is this really you, resent anon?
I don't use that name.
>You don't usually use this picture.... I guess I'll take your word for it.
?
>Or is it just a general, not addressed to anyone, vent?
Yes, if you don't write it down: it didn't happen. But it did, and not writing it down would be a betrayal of myself and others being oppressed.

>>82093033
It's an imposter. He's been doing it for months now.

>>82093051
>Yes, if you don't write it down: it didn't happen. But it did, and not writing it down would be a betrayal of myself and others being oppressed.
Ah, I gotcha. That's not really what I mean though... sorry, I know I was being confusing. I mean like when you say "to women", who exactly is that referring to?

>>82093070
Sometimes someone, sometimes a group, sometimes all, it varies. These posts are not rational, they are baccanalian, prose poetry, they convey a feeling a point, but they are not required to be perfect, clear or even coherent. They are an outburst a geyser of suppressed resentment. They are to whoever they happen to be to in that thread. The number of the subject changes from thread to thread. There's no need to explain, i find it perfectly valid for people to project their own interpretations for their own needs upon it. as Neitzche posited " I write so that I may be misinterpreted" read it whatever way is most valuable to you. People Identify with these threads for their own needs, they harmonize, it's not really a dialogue about me. It's just singing. I express for my own needs, and others in their own mutual benefit express satisfaction at the sharing of that articulated experience. There is a catharsis and also a usefulness in the way that all can see how to articulate the feeling. But each of us are singing our own tune, doing our own thing, and it is only the universality of our experience that cause us to sound similar. Who is it to? It's to whoever you need it to be, in the way it was to whoever I needed it to be. Call it death of the author or call it death of the authors.

>>82093131
you have a classical aesthetic, i will give you that much.

>>82092570 (OP)
One time you posted this thread and said something to the effect that you don't want anything to do with women. This is actually women's strategy working perfectly I think. They are really nasty to men they don't want near them and basically the opposite to some other small fraction of men.

>>82092570 (OP)
I am the cataclysm. I am the Whore of Babylon. I killed your God. Do you want me dead?

>>82093556
i have a steak ready just for u sweaty >:))

Based and Cat Pilled.
Swiped on more over 50s, nothing doing.