>>82110000Because in large parts of our society, women have replaced religion as the moral arbiter of everything. The logic is as follows:
1. Women are inherently virtuous and moral.
2. Since women are inherently moral, their sexuality must be inherently moral as well since it is a part of them.
3. Since female sexuality is inherently moral, it must only select those who are inherently moral because to do otherwise would be immoral.
4. Since female sexuality is inherently moral, it must only select against those who are inherently immoral.
Because women are inherently morally good, any problems cannot be their fault. If they were the fault of women, how could women be inherently moral?
In any case, I always find the appeal to nature sort of arguments amusing because if you take it to its logical end, then we should also let women who can't give birth without help, hungry mothers and kids, and those too old or weak to provide for themselves to die. But you won't ever see women advocating for that.
>>82109010It has nothing to do with money. I made about $300,000 last year and I'm still an incel.