>>82179677 (OP)Due to what statutory rape laws call "rape", your usage of that word doesn't really tell anything on about it being the boy's decision or not. Can you please use some language that gives a little bit more nuance?
I know the sexual autonomy of juveniles is a scary thing to you, and I am aware of the linguistics tricks the system uses to try to deny them their agency. I will call out big brother and his NPC's whenever I fucking see it, fucking punk piece of shit.
Sexual bonding is just like any other kind of bonding. If the young person says yes to it, it's morally neutral. I think religious people who try their hardest to paint sex as something evil to young people, and whom try their hardest to suppress the sexuality of juveniles, are the true "child molesters".
What the fuck do you think about that, you fat sack of shit?