What level are you with your sister
I'm at level 5 right now

>>82181931 (OP)
Siscest is hot but I feel physically revolted when I think about it with my real sister

>>82181949
>>82181931 (OP)
Incest is objectively one of if not the worst thing you could do genetically. Even if you don't procreate, the shame and disgust part that protects you from ever considering should still work; if your degen fantasies have overridden this system you are genuinely lower than even the most retarded of animals.

>>82181980
I'm interested in the science aspect of this, do you have any proof or are you just parroting what you've heard from others and questionable correlations? I've also heard that women reunited with their fathers after separation get crazy amounts of sexual attraction to them, and royalty/super rich families tend to inbreed. People usually say "muslims do it and they're stupid so it must be bad" but that's ignoring the fact that muslims are trash anyway so even if you mix trash with trash it's still trash. But what if you have a 10/10 gigachad family with optimized traits?

Regardless, your assertion that you should always follow emotions that you made is hilariously backwards and retarded. You just made an argument that if you have a desire to rape a woman or kill someone then you should do it instantly, just like a retarded animal would.

>>82182019
>and royalty/super rich families tend to inbreed
End result is picrel. He was a drooling retard who could barely speak and died prematurely.

I'm not an expert but I have a fair bit of knowledge of genetics over the average layman. To boil it down: . EVERY person carries at least 1-2 mutated genes, which is not a problem, since most disorders are recessive (you need two mutated genes to actually have the disorder) and you're supposed to marry with non carriers outside of your family, unless you marry your cousin who has 13% of your DNA (or your sister who is around 50% lol). Now your child has a proportianally far greater chance to actually develop the recessive genetic disorder. A lot of genetic disorders will cause additional gene deletions, which basically fucks up your childs code even more and makes them more at risk of conceiving a child with rare mutations, especially if they marry someone with the same conditions from the same bloodline. The important fact is that this basically has a snowballing effect, until after only a few generations you are left with picrel.

I'm hoping that you're young in which case you can forgiven, otherwise you might be genuinely retarded. Incest is objectively bad and frowned upon for a reason. The feeling of disgust is a natural and healthy response, like the need to take care of a child or protect your partner, nowhere near the feeling of wanting to rape/kill. Incest is in fact a large part of why mudslimes are the way they are. Pakis have on average a 70% of consanguineous blood, which is why the contry is filled with sub 70IQ dysgenic freaks. If you earnestly want to create offspring like that, then go ahead.

>>82181980
It's over-exaggerated
Normalfags will cry murder over incest yet won't say anything about a woman having kids over the age of 35, which has a higher chance of birth defects.

>>82182276
>a woman having kids over the age of 35, which has a higher chance of birth defects.
I mean having kids that late is retarded yes, but nowhere near the high chance of incest fucking over your bloodline forever. Older women have a small chance of their children being born with terrible disorders such as down (stats below)

20 years: 1 in 1,441 (~0.069%)
30 years: 1 in 959 (~0.104%)
40 years: 1 in 84 (~1.19%)
50 years: 1 in 44 (~2.27%) (though most women by then should be menopausal, also wtf are you doing having kids at that age)

Whilst doing a funny with your sister, again, has a 50/50 chance of having at least something wrong with them, whatever that may be is in God's hands at that point. Do you really want to play that game? Normies are retarded but incest is and will forever remain something the masses are right about, don't bang your sister.

Also men are also at risk of more birth defects as they age, specifically because their sperm quality degrades which creates a risk for de novo mutations. I'd put the treshold at 40-45.

>>82182402
1. That's a dishonest comparison. You're comparing the chance for a -specific- defect to ANY defect, however small. Doesn't seem like a reasonable way to compare things does it?
2. The chance isn't 50/50 for 1st gen incest babies, I know that for a fact.

>>82182427
Down is one of the most well known and common defects in older women. Other disorders are far rarer (as in above 1 in 5 to 10k) and are somewhat negligible as a result. This is wholly unprofessional but if I'd have to give an estimate I'd say 5% you get a fucked up baby, give or take.

I'm curious what you do know about 1st gen incest babies. Do you mean it's not 50/50 for recessive genes that stack up or not 50/50 for a genotypical mutation in general. Either way the fact you've actively researched this kind of stuff to justify your fetish is somewhat disturbing, if you still have some sanity left I suggest you get some help.

>>82182502
>>82182402
>>82182114
NTA, but you come off as extremely ignorant and incapable of self-reflection. Regurgitating dubious claims that you've inherited from your favourite twitch streamer is not impressive, realistic, or remotely insightful.

>>82182601
No, he's just not a delusional freak trying to justify his perversion

>>82182601
I study medicine so my info is fairly well sourced, the day I regurgitate anything from a twitch fag I will hang myself.
>>82182625
How come I'm the delusional perverted one? Incest is objectively bad and forever will be, I don't see how me pointing that out is wrong in any way.