Thread 82195312

>lead is bad, its need to be banned in everything because its bad for you!!!
>microplastics? Whats that?
Its funny how stuff is swept under the rug because its not financially convenient for a few people

start being a cat?

>>82195312 (OP)
Lead was also swept under the rug for forever and there are still people who want to bring it back because of muh culture war. There's significantly less evidence for the harms of microplastics than there was for lead though so we're never seeing it banned.

>>82195312 (OP)
The harmfulness of microplastics is not being swept under the rug at all
>>82195328
>less evidence for the harms of microplastics
I feel like you guys are just talking out your collective asses.

>>82195312 (OP)
I think of they tried ban lead in products nowadays people would freakout and protest over it.

>>82195338
>I feel like you guys are just talking out your collective asses.
There is no direct causal evidence of microplastics being harmful. It is reasonable to assume that they are harmful. Lead had direct causal evidence and banning it was still difficult. Try to read the post I wrote instead of the post you thought I wrote.

>>82195348
The problem is that there are no non-microplastic'd people to compare to
literally everyone has them

>>82195348
You are literally one of the people who would've said lead was harmless back in the day fucking kek

>>82195340
Like people freaked out when red states started banning puberty blockers and castrating people under the age of 18?

>>82195378
Presumably you can compare lower load populations to higher, though it might be difficult to pull out a signal from that given that unhealthy food tends to be higher in microplastics lel.
>>82195386
It was very clear for a very long time that lead was harmful and the mechanisms were well understood. I am not denying that microplastics are harmful. Read the words I wrote and stop injecting your own interpretation into them. I explicitly stated that assuming microplastics are harmful was reasonable.

>>82195406
>There is no direct causal evidence of microplastics being harmful
>>82195406
You lied in your first fucking sentence.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microplastics
Take a look at the health section. Microplastic levels have been linked to higher stroke and heart attack risk, they can disrupt gut biome, they can cause low level inflammation constantly, it is all there for you to read. Inflammation in particular combined with the other issues it causes can increase cancer risk. The evidence is already there. Nothing is done because banning plastic use would be several times harder than banning lead. We use it for fucking everything. Cars as they are right now cant work without plastics as well.

>>82195444
There is no direct causal evidence. Everything you're talking about is associations and mostly done in vitro or in murine models. Murine models can not be applied to humans 1:1. From your own article:
"Although the impacts of microplastics on human health are still being tested, their possible effects can be studied through human absorption models of nanomaterials that are produced by various industrial production processes"
Proving a direct causative role of a substance is not trivial.

>>82195479
And it took decades for people to link lead to adverse health effects. Meanwhile, people were poisoned and died from it. Most studies for microplastics are extremely recent and already bringing up enough concern. People like you being midwit faggots are why we never get anything good done. You are the oil industries best friend.

>>82195348
My two second Google shows me that there is plenty of evidence saying that microplastics are harmful

>>82195534
Are you retarded? I have continually said that microplastics are most likely harmful. I would be in favor of finding a way to ban them. My point is that the evidence is not conclusive and no one is going to ban them as is. Until we get very clear, definitive proof I don't see a ban happening at all. Learn to understand nuance, please.

>>82195544
Your AI babble is not based on direct causal evidence. It's based on associations, in vitro studies, and murine models. Go ask ChatGPT if you like AI so much. Ask it "Is there direct causal evidence of harm from microplastics in humans?".

>>82195552
Anonymous of 4chan

I am the arbiter of truth and have come to tell you that while you are obviously correct, you are mega-gay for replying to the other person for the 4th time in a row, they are clearly trolling or retarded

>>82195598
I'm bored and waiting for my beans to finish cooking lol

>>82195552
>>82195574
>>82195598
>muh causal evidence
kek useful idiots for the oil industry.
>b-buh I said i believe it is bad
Ok? Why are you butthurt about other people saying it is bad?

>>82195574
Google AI results pull from real sources. I don't know why you are trying to argue in favor of microplastics. Is this supposed to be bait? What is the point in what you're saying?

>>82195659
I'm actually very invested in the oil industry, it's like half my portfolio at the moment. I routinely post anti-solar propaganda on Reddit to try and help out.
>>82195679
>doesn't know that associations aren't causal until proved otherwise
NGMI!

>>82195694
>sells out other people for crumbs off some arab's asshole
kek yep sounds about right for this board

>>82195721
I'm up 15% on CVX and 25% on REI. Eating good over here. And those CVX divvies are nice.

>>82195752
So, like I said, crumbs off an arab's asshole.

>>82195773
I don't think either of those have extensive Arab operations. REI is all US anyway.

>>82195785
>cvx
>doesn't have extensive arab operations
Fucking kek

>>82195837
>60,000 barrels a day in Arabia
>1,000,000 barrels a day in the Permian
hmm
Arabia is less than 2% of CVX's total output bubsydoodle

>>82195856
What percent of the 27 billion they make in the middle east do you get?

>>82195884
4.4% divvy m80. Thought we were talking about Arabia not the whole mid east doe. You DO know geography, right?

>>82195902
So, like I said before, you get crumbs and in return you shill for them.

>>82195914
Those crumbs bought me a new computer last month why should I be mad about it? Sounds like you're just poor and lack capital to invest.

>>82195930
Is that supposed to be impressive? I invested in crypto and was able to get a car. I wasnt online shilling it like a little cuck either lmao

>>82195949
>investing in crypto
>mad about oil
lmao bro how much energy do shitcoins use again?

>>82195966
I would be fine with oil industries shutting down. There are better alternatives energy sources.

>>82195985
I'd be fine with it too. I've started buying solar stocks because they've been getting crushed so I'll switch on the pro-solar propaganda soon while selling my big time oil winners. You see ENPH today? I bought that yesterday lmao, great call amirite?

>>82196006
Then why are you so fucking butthurt and admitted you shill propaganda against other energy sources lmao Jesus christ you are a massive attention whore

>>82196022
I shill oil because I own oil. When I've switched to renewables I'll shill those. I shill whatever I own. You should see the ads I write for Outback Steakhouse on Reddit and xitter lmao.

>>82195312 (OP)
We know lead blocks radiation so they probably got rid of it just to fuck with and kill everyon project naomi etc etc it's all fucking gay anyways my go kill myself lmao bye.

>>82195312 (OP)
WTF I'm not gonna do a cat

>>82195395
Lol I'm glad I didn't have to say which people I was talking about. You knew automatically. You guys are so fucking retarded. You got rage baited into electing a child rapist

>>82196756
I have proof of the excesses of LGBTism. What proof do you have of presidential child rape?