To Women,

I resent you. What reason would I have to like you? You don't display any warmth towards me. You have no sympathies for me. Honestly you spend more effort trying to blame me for the harships of life than anything, esopecially when you're causing it. You're a suck up to power. Your sense of right and wrong is so corrupt that i don't consider you moral. I feel alienated from you. It's not from anything I did. I feel that way because of the way you choose to treat me. Honestluty, if you liked me, i think i'd be worried i was doing something wrong. I would seriously doubt myself. You are so corrupt, so shallow, so approving of irresponsible evil, that i would be seriously worried about my own character. That's how poisonous of an existence you are in my mind. I don't understand how this world can subsist, surely it couldn't have always been like this because it feels utterly unsustainable. This is a world where morality, work, contributing are all punished and being selfish despicable addicts is the sole thing that is rewarded. You are a strange and depraved aspect of the society I live in, and I can neither reason, nor congregate with you: you're just too treacherous.

Anon

>Last Thread:
>>82187699

>>82199463 (OP)
haiiii nonny pls notice me im ur #1 fan sonny

Women are weird because when they do something to develop a reputation, they actually blame you for thinking poorly of them instead of feeling bad about their shitty behavior.

>>82199463 (OP)
Howdy anon, something's been on my mind lately. I'm not gonna drop the scrapbook again, instead I want to get into a specific part of it, mammalian male dispersal.

It is an established fact that male parental investment in mammals is practically non-existent.
Have you ever wondered if women just abhor the idea of fatherhood? I mean strictly speaking, it goes against mammal nature, the males usually leave their social group to reduce reproductive conflict and to secure territory.
I'm not even going to narrow this down to feminists who are *completely* honest about this with their idea of destroying patriarchal family models, because I think the pattern applies on a wider scale, it's not just the "crazies". Have you ever wondered if women just subconsciously do their best to enforce this fundamental part of mammal behavior, nag fathers away from their offspring and then report that their "emotional needs" were not met to present it as socially acceptable?

>>82200668
>Parental investment theory.
Please show me where we can find the "I do(n't) care" gene in your room, schizo. Do you know what's harder than being pregnant? Staying with a nagging wife who's pregnant. We do it anyway because those of us who are not niggers do our best to manage our biological drives towards the highest good. Your kind is always circular and backwards reasoning like this:
- Look there's a whore. She must be r-selecting.
>Look there's a trad wife. She must be k-selecting.
>Look there's a whore turned trad wife. She must have hit the wall.
>Look there's a trad wife turned whore. Must be jewish brainwashing.
Zero predictive power. Show me a model that we can apply to a random female that predicts exactly what kind of mating she's going to make. You can't so what your doing is not science.

>>82200787
>Please show me where we can find the "I do(n't) care" gene in your room, schizo
Well, whatever it is, it's probably a polygenic trait involved with serotonin regulation and it's not in my room, but in your genome.

>We do it anyway because those of us who are not niggers do our best to manage our biological drives towards the highest good.
Then I'm glad we have an understanding, although "highest good" is open to interpretation and a male and a female probably have very different feelings about it's definition.

The family structure we had boils down to three major forces, female nature doing everything it can to destroy it, the male reverting to it's natural baseline and male willpower making an attempt at counteracting both of these. Two of those just happen to exist as background noise, the last one has to be created in some way.
Every single observable trend points towards women as a collective seeking to escape this arrangement and men not being able to contain them. The groundwork for what we have now was laid two centuries ago, women(often women with families) started the process of dissolving the containment system when having male offspring was arguably still the path of least resistance and it gave them readily apparent benefits in life. That's why I argue that even a offering a good deal for both parties won't solve this problem, as it's not about calculated outcomes, but feelings and instincts.

>Show me a model that we can apply to a random female that predicts exactly what kind of mating she's going to make.
Not how it works, you can however take a 100,000 random females from the current population, observe their life outcomes and and measure up how the loss of methods of control directly resulted in waning male willpower and male dispersal(single motherhood) over the last two centuries.
Individuals matter very little in this whole argument, it's about populations.

I get the feeling you're misinterpreting the argument on purpose.

Based and Caturday Pilled.
Matched with another couple of GILFs. They didn't message first, so I messaged them. No fucking answer, and no block. What is the fucking point? Also had a scammer with fake photos and a changed age from when I swiped. Of course the scammer messages.
>
If that's not bad enough, 4chan X is fucked, making this site almost unusable for me. Just losing the thread watcher alone is depressing.
I picked this up from the extension's reviews on Chrome store:
>To fix the extention you need to download it manually from their website then edit the manifest.json from version 2 to version 3 and install it manually.
But I don't know how the fuck to do that. I tried converting/saving the .crx file as a ZIP, but it wouldn't open. Even if I could get it to work, I'd probably lose all my filters. It doesn't seem possible that I can even access them to save them in a text file since faggot Chrome killed the extension. Please God, someone hosts a fixed version, or the extension makers release an update that is usable, then I can carry on as before.

>>82201177
Okay, I found a way to get a reprieve and reactivate 4chanx once more. Basically change these flags, restart browser, change more flags:
R*ddit 1itw1bz (Yes, yes; fuck R*ddit, etc.) As per: 4chanx's github.
I had caught a thread by chance on /g/'s archive that mentioned changing these flags, but I missed the restart part, and could not see the other ones that needed to be changed. I've backed up my filter and the archive link for future reference. I also have the added bonus of getting the use of Imagus once more.
Still, unless there's a way to convert or update these extensions, they will be killed again.
The add-on on fucking Firefox doesn't load captchas, and the archive link is screwed.
>Of course the faggot filter thinks this post with information is spam.