If a girl is physically mature(has periods), and consents for sex, why is it wrong for her to have sex with anyone she wants? Consent means she is having fun.

Explain without any logical fallacies

>>82200711 (OP)
You are brown
>Explain without any logical fallacies
Stop being 14

>>82200711 (OP)
The telos of sex is procreation. Procreation should only occur in the context of marriage, the covenant created by God for child rearing, as this provides children with the most stable form of upbringing to give them the best chance of life; having both a mother and a father.

Therefore sex that occurs outside of this covenant is sinful.

Teenage boys can mature and can consent to the military. So what is wrong with asking them at age 14 to sign up for the military and go off to fight for globohomo?

>>82200711 (OP)
I have never met a girl who started having sex young that turned out mentally stable and functional. They always become drug addicts and suicidal.

>>82200744
That's because the first guy to fuck them just used them for sex. If they entered a stable, happy relationship at that age they would be fine.

>>82200756
Pedos have brain matter and testosterone issues which makes them incapable of monogamy. They also lose attraction to the girl as she ages so its not a sustainable or fair arrangement on the girl.

>>82200761
I am capable of monogamy and I am still attracted to women thoughever.

>>82200780
Are you saying you would be happy only having sex and jerking off to one girl for the rest of your life? Because hmmmm somehow I dont believe you. Notice how you said women, the plural too.

>Explain without any logical fallacies
>"LOGIC" meme in 2025

humans are bound by emotivism

I'm not certain if your post is asking for arguments against pedophilia or arguments against (mature) promiscuity.

I can give a more in-depth argument if you specify, but for now I'll saddle both.
>physically mature
That's not psychologically mature.
I don't think most girls or women are really psychologically mature to affect most things of import (especially not voting).

kids are stupid and you are a degenerate

>NOO MORALS AREN'T LOGIC
in that case I'll just stand somewhere else whistling while the normies lynch you, why should I die on that hill just so you can, forgive my plain language, stick your cock in a child

lol, lmao even

>>82200761
>They also lose attraction to the girl as she ages so its not a sustainable or fair arrangement on the girl.
These conversations really depend on technical definitions. When you say pedo do you mean the actual definition of pre puberty or the newspeak definition of "anything between puberty and 18 or 21 or 25 or whatever the current feminist talking point is"?
Regardless, most men who have attraction to girls are not exclusive pedophiles, statistically. So they could indeed be attracted to the same girl well after she matures.

>>82200785
>Are you saying you would be happy only having sex and jerking off to one girl for the rest of your life?
NTA but yeah, at least insofar as the "having sex" part, that's not only doable but it's preferred. Sex is very messy emotionally and restricting it to one person makes things much neater.
As to fapping, if it's imagination or fiction I consider that fair for either party. Real stuff not so much.

>Notice how you said women, the plural too.
That's... how attraction works, yes. You are attracted to a category, and you pick your mate from within that category. Women are attracted to men (plural) too.

>>82200785
Yes, that is what I am saying. It's okay if you don't believe me. Weird gotcha, "women" is grammatically correct there and technically correct as well.