It's pretty hard to argue with the numbers. Dating men is simply not logical.

>>82201889 (OP)
Imagine reading this LMFAO

>>82201906
>I can't read
One of many reasons women refuse to date you.

hopefully men wise up that women rot like milk and stop bothering with dating foids over 21

>>82201889 (OP)
I can c-cook... and clean...
*burst into tears*

>>82201889 (OP)
>men do worse in school
Damn it's harder to program them into slaves
>make less money than women
I thought muh wage gap??!
>refuse to develop emotional literacy
She means refuse to read her mind because she can't communicate due to her lack of emotional literacy, shown by lack of empathy and making decisions based on "logic"
>refuse to have a social life
You yell at him whenever he hangs out with his friends
>don't help around the house
This one is fair if both of you work the same amount of hours

>>82201911
Grrr read my ragebait slop of biased conclusions from a lonely miserable hag

>>82201889 (OP)
Women think if they make more money they're working harder than a man making less money, intuitively this would make sense if their jobs weren't always office jobs of 10% work 90% gossiping while their male coworker picks up all their actual workload because the company rightfully doesn't trust them

>>82201889 (OP)
>Dating men is simply not logical.
It goes both ways. As a permavirgin, I've noticed I don't have to spend money on a bunch of crap I'd be forced to spend money on if I had a gf. Relationships are expensive. You have to go out with your gf, travel with her, buy her presents for her bday, V-day and the holidays and so on. Normies tell me women also expect to be driven everywhere, even in my walkable Euro city.
I've ended up quite rich for my country and age group and it's mostly because I've never bothered to approach a woman. Financially, it's very stupid to date, marry and have kids. I mean, why do you think the media outlets owned by billionaires are constantly trying to make us feel like losers for being single? Being single means we're not consooming at the rate they'd want us to be consooming.

>>82201985
>they're working harder than a man
Who is Ada Lovelace? Who is Marie Curie?

>>82201985
>their jobs weren't always office jobs of 10% work 90% gossiping while their male coworker picks up all their actual workload because the company rightfully doesn't trust them
Kek, this is exactly what happens at my engineering job. My team leader gives women with 6yrs of experience small-time jobs and they manage to fuck up even those. Meanwhile after 2yrs I'm already doing more high responsibility tasks than these foids.
He openly told me he only trusts women with repetitive, inconsequential tasks, because after 15yrs in the field, he knows how incompetent they tend to be. The "women in STEM" thing is a meme.

>>82201889 (OP)
Subhuman disgusting dykes shouldn't be allowed to have children. This is evil. Those kids will be messed up.

>>82202113
whatever do you mean, anon?

>>82202000
>every women is ada lovelace
Its time to go to bed roastie, you have school tomorrow o algo

>"researcher" is a liberal woman who definitely doesn't have a political and social bias against men and who definitely didn't study at some liberal propaganda machine university

Yeah I bet the study methodology and results are not misconstrued with emotional bias at all.

Women becoming "scientists" was a grave failure.

>>82201889 (OP)
>that gay guy at the end defending straight men
Giga kek

>>82202231
Interesting times we live in, huh?

>>82202000
>sciencesloppers
f*male literacy was a mistake

Dating at all isn't logical. Being around people isn't logical. Why suffer around some other asshole when I can just relax alone?