Thread 82203238

Men:
>I friggin' love science.
>NOOOOOO, NOT LIKE THAT!!!!!

>I friggin' love science
>posts history
women should have the amount of rights that they have had historically too

>>82203238 (OP)
Women's preference is only eugenic in the sense that their sons are more likely to be Chads. They dont select for thing that actually matter like intelligence, mental health, etc. Also most men on this board hate science because they think da j0oz use it as social control bc of conservatard covid brainrot.

Why do the words in blue at the bottom of the image seem all gay sounding? Who talks like that? Is that a real language?

Anyway incels were dropping the same blackpill mutually decades ago, nothing new.

>>82203238 (OP)
Women:
>I friggin love natural selection
>NOOOOOOOO DON'T RAPE ME CHUD NOOOOOOO I DIDN'T MEAN IT LIKE THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>82203280
kek
makes them mad

>>82203268
>things should be brutal like the past
>NOOOO NOT LIKE THAT

>>82203238 (OP)
science: women get pregnant more often from rape
science: women get pregnant more often when they orgasm during sex
wome.:
>I friggin' love science.
>NOOOOOO, NOT LIKE THAT!!!!!

>>82203280
But we have naturally selected against rape? If you have a natural urge to rape, your rapebaby will most likely get aborted and you will spend the rest of your life in a cage with no women around.

>>82203307
i didnt disagree with your point i just wanted it to apply fully
ironically you seem to be the one you are making fun of

>>82203238 (OP)
Roasties:

OMG I friggin love equality like OMG
> NOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT!!!

>>82203342
This chart is literally from some random incel's blog fifteen years ago.

>>82203238 (OP)
When you look at the Russian population pyramid this retarded narrative collapses. When a bunch of men die, chads don't go around impregnating roasties, the roasties just grow old and don't have kids. Foids just don't have kids now and don't really serve any purpose, they don't contribute taxes, many of the jobs they work serve no purpose.

>>82203330
>But we have naturally selected against rape?
>Abortion
>Prison
>natural selection
Are you retarded?

>>82203330
By this logic we've also naturally selected against scenarios like OP's picrel. Rape is just as unnatural as sending incels to die in war so that women can be a part of a harem. In a state of nature, rape babies were very common, but you don't actually want to return to a state of nature, do you?

Femoids want you dead for being short and/or autistic
never forget that

>>82203330
Thats not true. Rape is increasingly legal in the west. Muslims routinely get 12 months at most for raping kids, and the sentences get shorter every year.
Natural selection is kinda making a return, little foid, and none of the incels you insult will want to protect you. Enjoy!

lol, men who didn't get a family or sex didn't go to war. That's the whole point of civilization, to allow non-chads to serve the system, otherwise they become violent or in the best case just drop out. Why go to die for nothing when you've got to defend?

Also, religious positions weren't for incels but volcels. That's why Eunuchs had power and were respected because giving up your sexual desire was seen as the ultimate sacrifice.

If we would've allowed women and their hypergamy go rampant we would've gone extinct. The only reason why we were able to beat the Neanderthals was because we were able to cooperate, because they were much stronger than we are.

>>82203418
I'm just saying the grids going to go down if there ever was a draft. The sheer amount of sabotage would be unsustainable

Who birthed the low quality men?

>>82203353
This is New Zealands data. Are you going to say "its made up by muh inkwells" again? Just admit that you literally have never contributed anything.

You foids are literally nothing but parasites.

>>82203238 (OP)
This is just factually untrue, sure royals and warlords had harems but to think that most peasants didn't still have wives is retarded. She gets her history knowledge from fantasy smut

>>82203466
I think she means humans before civilization. Like paleolithic hunter-gatherer tribes before any kind of agriculture, animal husbandry, or advanced tools. Once humans settled down into civilizations, all men were given wives to keep them docile and subservient.

>>82203536
Ah I see, so her argument is that we should act like ooga booga cavemen (expect all the civilization benefits men gave her of course, and the tribal r8p that would happen).

>>82203379
Why are you even asking? This troon has revealed itself to be retarded already
>>82203238 (OP)
Do you ragebait strangers online because you have a humiliation kink or because you have brain damage?

>>82203238 (OP)
>references science
>is scientifically illiterate

If eugenics and science were the most important thing, then the genetic benefit and imperative of *everyone* reproducing would be encouraged.

>>82203536
we dont have any real evidence to know how they worked, we can only assume things thanks to modern uncontacted tribes
and guess what?
guys in those still have wives, kids and all that stuff
there is no top chad warlord that gets all the pussy while other guys have to work for free
ofc it would never work, because it would take 2 incels to bash the skull of a single chad in

>>82203536
>listen to women
>single chad impregnating many women
>tons of children but few protectors
>end up being wiped out by a smarter and more apt specie
it wasn't as if as soon we reached civilization status, we saw monogamy as the logical path. Our ancestors knew it was the only way to survive and it was gradual, even when we were hunter-gatherers.