Thread 82279182

was Chad a myth all along?

>>82279182 (OP)
studies show women prefer BBC.

>>82279182 (OP)
>myth
>>82279182 (OP)
>along

>>82279182 (OP)
I can choose to believe this science or the funny gigachad meme. Guess which one I am going to pick.
Also who cares.

Twinkchad is still Chad. You're not going anywhere, incel.

>>82279204
Gigachad literally doesn't exist, it's a fake edit his communist gf made to satirize gym bros or the patriarchy or something.

>>82279224
He's reaI to me

>>82279182 (OP)
"Chad" has feminine features relative to say a heavy-set hairy plumber with massive eyebrows and a giant round nose. Women have always preferred prettyboys on average, especially younger women.

>>82279182 (OP)

Science is pozzed and dogmatic. Women like prettyboys, and in this sense, women can prefer a more feminine face, however, the face is fundamentally still very well-developed and masculine, just with feminine undertones. Did this study control for birth control which is known to affect female preferences for masculine/feminine traits?

>>82279401
Yes, they controlled for that since the studies you're citing used small sample sizes and later studies with larger samples found this was a myth. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5703419/Taking-pill-does-NOT-make-women-attracted-rugged-men.html

>>82279182 (OP)
Lol, I want to see these "feminine" features.

>>82279438

I am suspicious of your study. I think this is one of those cases again where we have to go with the anecdotal evidence we're actually seeing on the ground as opposed to what a bunch of out-of-the-loop, liberal scientific snobs think.

>>82279182 (OP)
You could also acknowledge the snorpu's facial features! If you don't know snorpu, look here >>82276967

>>82279577
Why are you arguing against scientific research at the same time you're trying to sell this small sample size study to me? The one referred to in this image >>82279401 ?
And I don't care what you shitposted on Reddit with your alt account. Here's a randomized controlled trial. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000625

Men and women have been getting more feminine for decades now and half of the "chads" you people post look like effete zoomers with muscles. Normal women still prefer masculine men.

>>82279671
Not true
>t. Masculine man

>>82279201
>studies show women prefer BBC.
Studies? You can just walk outside your parents place and see it for yourself kek

>>82279624

>Why are you arguing against scientific research at the same time you're trying to sell this small sample size study to me?

Science can be useful but it must be taken with a grain of salt with respect to certain topics because it has official narratives everywhere. If you are a cocksucking academic overinvesting into the research machine, that isn't my problem. But go ahead. Defend euphemistic labels for female craziness, defend Sudden Infant Death Syndrome when it's really just women committing infanticide, defend everything else about science if it's so absolute. You are everything that you hated in what you replaced - religion. You will always be behind what is the real truth just as you were with germ theory.

I never linked any study by the way. It was a screenshot cropped to put emphasis on the physical dimorphism of two men based on testosterone levels.

>>82279201
Why aren't they paying for the loicense then

I Fuckin Love Science

>>82279182 (OP)
i poisoned chad

>>82279182 (OP)
Replace "people" with "female sociology students" and you will be closer to the truth.

>>82279876
You were arguing based off one study you heard about.
Your argument boils down to "your study bad, mine good". It's ridiculous "logic".

>>82279904
do they have one for birthrates?

>>82279224
damn, it really backfired lmao
it became the symbol of hypermasculinity, self-perfection and I guess everything she hates

>>82280665
Reminds me of Ken in the Barbie movie.