>>82506480 (OP)
>>82506518
>>82506642
By finding tattooed women disgusting and knowing that I have no idea if I like any woman at all because of this (unless I see them naked) and even so that the feelings of lust are only skin deep and even un-tattooed women are like flowers in bloom, they look and smell beautiful for a while, but I rarely find women over 50 sexy and also tnever over 60. I'm already in my late 30s and not expecting to pull a Leonardo DiCaprio, so ideally I would disillusion myself from lust completely like a monk, but not like a monk since I can still shamelessly enjoy the sight and smell of 20-40 year old women regardless if I ever get to touch them, but like I said, seeing tattoos on so many of them and knowing that all sexy bodies will wither and shrivel up into saggy wrinkly old ladies hs negated any importance placed upon sex, relationships or female validation. You might say that the cabal or the jews or the reptillians ruined the beauty of women by infesting society with the tattoo mind-body virus, but it has only had a catalytic effect on spiritual awakening by spoiling the natural aesthetic of the human body such that more of us become disillusioned with vanity, we do not confuse the book for it's cover. I can listen to tattoo-coverted people talk and ignore their body and focus on the message being brought forward, not not the case with romance, because it turns out that romance is all cover, no book. At least for men like me that is the case, the visual sex appeal being entirely based upon the appearanc of the body, without regard to any social conventions, statuses, norms or standards. If I don't find a body beautiful I don't want it in bed with me. This is the opposite of how straight women operate, they do not see male bodies as beauty objects, but their sexual attractions drives form something else entirely. Thus you will never rifnd a woman who refuses men because of tattoos, even if she herself feels too pretty to have them on her body
