Thread 82835825

A thread died for this and now you have to think about it

>>82835825 (OP)
yeah both mid bitches, one of whom married epstein's best friend

I don't understand the joke, explain it.

>>82835825 (OP)
Bill and Hillary never loved each other, why do you think he wound up getting a blowjob from Monica? And why do you think she put up with it and stayed with him?
It was just two ruthlessly ambitious and craven people who signed a business partnership to help each other get money and power, those two things being all either of them ever really cared about.

>>82835854
The joke is that Hillary Clinton kinda gives you a boner, and you weren't expecting it. Subversion of expectations.

Every day I wish Hilldawg won in 2016, the fat orange pedophile was banished back to TV irrelevancy, and the absolute NIGHTMARE of the past 10 years went differently instead of this fat monster and his awful awful supporters dictating culture for my entire teen years + adult life so far.

>>82835864
I love my girlfriend and I still wind up getting blowjobs from sexy coworkers. There are more things that exist in heaven and earth than in your philosophy. You know why men never divorce their wives to marry their mistresses? Because they love their wives.

>>82835877
I remember the night Trump won in 2016, I was spending the night with my FWB and we both were flabbergasted, and then we fucked and I accidentally came up her nose because I pulled out and she tried to swallow it but wasn't quite fast enough and POP straight up her nostril and then she started sneezing my cum. Good times.
But yeah, fuck Trump.

>>82835877
>instead of this fat monster and his awful awful supporters dictating culture for my entire teen years + adult life so far
oh yeah donald trump put niggers, faggots and foids in every piece of media for 10 years, i forgot.

>>82835825 (OP)
To think she skins faces of children.

>>82835825 (OP)
Imagine Kamala domming Hillary

>>82835915
All I know is the world would be a better place if the last 10 years went different, there is no way in hell it could've been worse having moderate center-liberal woman obama 2.0 as president. If Hill had won how do you know that woke stuff wouldn't of been much less intense as opposed to intensifying as a reaction to trump?

>>82835885
well obviously you don't, since you're cheating on her and don't care. That's pretty callous of you.

That said, your affairs and indiscretions aren't headline news on TV every night for months on end. Suppose CNN had a special every night about how you'd been sexually unfaithful to your girl and both she and you had reporters asking you for comment all hours of the day. Would she put up with that? Would you feel guilty for putting her through it? Most relationships wouldn't survive that. Bill and Hillary did because their marriage was never about love or fidelity, it was always just a means to an end. (which he got and she fell short of)

>>82835825 (OP)
How many ppl did they kill?

>>82835938
>Would she put up with that?
Probably.
>Would you feel guilty for putting her through it?
Probably.

I think im gonna propose soon

>>82835825 (OP)
Theres a theory that most of the people at the top are related. Which is why all the Presidents descend from King John of England.

>>82835932
>moderate center-liberal woman obama 2.0 as president
you do know she was warned about weinstein and accepted donations from him anyway, right? it'd be like having bill clinton 2.0 in the white house without the benefit of the end of the cold war. lots of wonkish targeted policies to win over special interest groups and donors.
>If Hill had won how do you know that woke stuff wouldn't of been much less intense
metoo would have still happened along with BLM protests and DEI. it probably would have been worse because, again, a lot of the guys who got metooed were democrat donors because they were from hollywood and worked in the media.

>>82835984
It's crazy because I don't think Sydney Sweeney is very attractive at all, so Hillary is the way cuter and hotter option.

>>82835877
they need to stop putting women in races against fuckfaces because the fuckface will always win. No one wants a female president not even women

>>82835998
>it'd be like having bill clinton 2.0 in the white house
That sounds awesome. Do you really think the Clinton 90s weren't better in every way than everything that's happened since 2001?

>>82835825 (OP)
Hillary was more demure and ladylike.
Sydney is a turbocharged slut.

>>82836021
you do know i wrote other things in my post that explained why bill clinton 2.0 would have been shit?

>>82836094
Because he catered to special interest groups? Who cares?

>>82835853
>women have unattainable standards
>sydney sweeney is mid

>>82836008
shes a plant like everyone else

>>82835932
Is it getting worse tho? From my daily Interactions it seems even the normies are starting to notice and get tired of it, the gaming Industry looks like it's finally beginning to heal and even fucking Roman Catholicism is making a comeback with zoomers

>>82836132
She is tho

>>82836116
I care because it's that type of thinking that gave us woke culture and intersectionality.
>>82836132
she is. you should try being a short cutie like cailee spaeny instead

>>82836191
>intersectionality
Nothing wrong with it.
>woke culture
Meaningless conservative buzzwords. Conservacucks will call it "woke" if a woman has short hair or a black person exists.

>>82836220
>Nothing wrong with it.
...it's special interest groups working together and a cornerstone of wokeness
>Meaningless conservative buzzwords. Conservacucks will call it "woke" if a woman has short hair or a black person exists.
i'm assuming you're just some rando because the guy i was originally talking to accepted woke culture was bad;
>If Hill had won how do you know that woke stuff wouldn't of been much less intense as opposed to intensifying as a reaction to trump?

>>82836254
>it's special interest groups working together
And that's bad how?

>>82836363
It's bad because it makes everything gay and boring, which is also the end goal of cuckservatives: to make everything boring and shitty and adhering to a single, global worldview that makes a small group of people more powerful. The only real difference is in which group of elites enacts their plans first.

>>82836132
I understand you're American and think any woman that isn't fat is an automatic 8/10 but she is kinda mid to anyone who's vains don't pump corn syrup and onions bean oil

>>82836390
Intersectionality is usually about recognizing the non-elites, the people that don't usually get a seat at the table.

>>82836437
Intersectionality is about distracting from the class divide in order to cry about other demographics, and it is enacted top down by the state and corporate entities as a method of union busting. Pretending otherwise is disingenuous. Class is the only thing that actually matters. If intersectionality and DEI actually did anything or mattered in regards to helping the average person, multinational, trillion dollar corporate entities wouldn't be using it as a bludgeon.

>>82836437
no it's about recognising a bunch of dipshits who all hate each other but realise they can work together to get money from the ruling class. it's counter-revolutionary liberal shit

>>82835877
So instead of a fat orange pedophile you wanted the woman still going to bat for an old pedophile?

>>82836492
>>82836492
A bunch of disparate groups with their own special interests learning to work together against the interests of the ruling class is actually base-level revolutionary shit. Like pre-requisite revolutionary shit.

>>82836500
a revolutionary movement exists to OVERTHROW the ruling class, not seek concessions from it. you're confusing reforming movements with revolutionary ones, like social democracy vs communism

It must have been a shit thread or one that reached the bump limit if it died for this one.

>>82836552
A movement that forges links between disparate groups is the only kind of movement that would be able to overthrow the ruling class. You're ignoring praxis to stay in a purity bubble. Social democrats have been necessary in every successful communist revolution.

>>82836628
>A movement that forges links between disparate groups is the only kind of movement that would be able to overthrow the ruling class
no a movement needs a single ideologically pure vanguard to carry out the revolution. your democratic coalitions have always been used to provide legitimacy to the ruling class and only win things the ruling class either doesn't care about or are willing to part with.
>You're ignoring praxis to stay in a purity bubble.
you're ignoring history, this is the absolute fucking basis or marxist-leninism. it's fine to be a mushy little anarchist or socdem, just don't pretend you're pro revolutions lol
>Social democrats have been necessary in every successful communist revolution.
social democrats have opposed every single communist movement because they care about process over outcomes.

>>82835825 (OP)
>I'm brown and I can't tell the difference between white people lolol