>>82856518
>But being better is part of the equation here. Its hard to define and not really even worth investigating beyond the idea itself
If it's part of an equation then you need to define it. That's what being part of an equation means, it means you've made a clear and essential definition which is both sound and complete.
>but its clear that in op the gamer guitar guy is better than 99% of his peers
It is not to me.
>which is more likely than not true.
I'm not convinced of that point, you are assuming that, and the vague notion of "elsewhere" is lazy of you. If you're going to admonish someone for something they do, provide and assert an alternative or admit you have nothing useful to tell them. If all you have to offer is derision for something they did, and no positive prescription for what they should do instead you are being a reductive crab in a bucket discouraging people for nothing. You can't be vague, you can't just complain and bitch that you don't like what they did, you have to give them clear and actionable advice, and you damn well better have tried it yourself before you go telling someone else what to do.
Offer a clear prescription of how to orient a life, and make a justification, else you are a fool and a hypocrite and a naysayer and should focus on administrating yourself before administrating others. A feminist slag on twitter is beneath a streamer playing guitar hero, for all you can diminish him, he does seem to entertain people in the same pointless way as a real rock guitar player. He is seemingly benign, whereas the complainer takes pride in being acid for others, inspiring their worst most hypocritical and condescending traits to feed their pride. If i were to consider who was better, i'd say the gamer in this scenario is a measureably better person, and anyone who would bemoan him without a clear explanation for why and a clear precription alternative is lesser, whether the whore in question has sex is meaningless in my values.
