>>83041255
Who said they were? Charlie Kirk was a toxic troll whose literal full time job was coming up with outrageous things to offend people and "triggering" as many people as his platform allowed. He apparently "triggered" the wrong person and they snapped and killed him.
Floyd was a random junkie who was struggling to get his shit together who was murdered in cold blood by a heavily armed group of men whose job it is, ostensibly, to enforce the law.
You can be against murder and still think the guy was a dickhead, and you can also be against counterfeiting and still think summary executions are probably something we want to discourage as a society.
Notice how if you quote Charlie Kirk today, you'll get yourself kicked off any of the major platforms, face book, twitter, whatever. All you have to do is say something he said, and even attribute it to him so it's clear it's a good guy who said it, and your account gets suspended. For this guy, we flew flags at half mast and treated it like 9/11. How does that even make sense?