Thread 83054656

Why do women enjoy being corporate slave it's crazy

Every youtube short, every tiktok video, every instagram reel, it's just women talking the life of a corporate slavery. "Get ready with me to go to work today., I work from 9-11, have lunch 11:30am, more work, free lunch offer from corporate yay!, more work until 5pm which is time for dinner from corporate which means I don't gotta leave ever! we can just keep working and working never have to leave home!. Pinch me I must be dreaming!"

Who would've know the servile half of our race likes to serve, lol

>>83054656 (OP)
Usually in a office there are only 2-3 people actually working, i'd wager the people who make these kinds of videos aren't these people

>>83054656 (OP)
The secret is women don't actually do almost any work when they're "at work". They browse social media on their phone and gossip with coworkers all day. It's basically adult day care for them.

>>83054656 (OP)
because the corporate world is a sweatshop where a precise touch matters and men should all do labor. get a gym membership, lift heavy eat big.

>>83054656 (OP)
it's fun for them when they're early 20s, they get to feel like a girlboss wearing cute work clothes and doing nothing but answering a few pointless emails.

but overall female happiness has been drastically declining each year. foids forget the entire game changes when they age and aren't cute anymore. then they're miserable

I hate women too but let's be honest no one here is contributing to society in any meaningful way.
Staying home and masturbating isn't really a noble cause

>>83054739

what the fuck

we are staying home because we disagree with societal order, and we are at the forefront of philosophical and ethical debate

>>83054662

fpbp, estrogen makes you agreeable, submissive, and servile

>>83054958

That post in the image is so, so frustratingly fucking stupid and the epitome of the kind of midwit posting that goes on on /pol/ that also gets the most answers and praise.

He is making shit up based on "muh evolutionary psychology", which is simply fiction at this point. I could also say "people who are skinny parse information through a consensus filter because they're closer to starving than fat people so more reliant on others", "tall men are subconsciously more likely to believe in social consensus, because their head is a more visible target, so they have to be careful", "the high divorce rate is because women realize that their husband is a beta and her children carry his genetics, so she subconsciously wants them to lack food and die". This line of thought is just so stupid.

Besides, he is ignoring the fact that social hierarchy and power don't work based on physical strenght at all, and this is something anyone can see.

Most people believe in social consensus and don't really question anything, sure. That's the only true part.

His conclusion is also fucking stupid and ignores everything we know from historical lessons on the outcomes of different political systems. Because while the redditor type of midwit cares about establishment approved sources too much, the chud type of midwit simply doesn't read, doesn't think too deeply either, and believes in whatever feels right.

When he says "tribe" you already know he's a fucking retard. Not to mention the "hey autists!".

>>83054656 (OP)
It's not work, it's a daycare.
>>83054681
Trippy bippy

>>83055105
nice pasta lmaooo

>>83055105

>making a simple topic complicated

Are you a foid o algo? That guy in the image used simple A-->B tier logic.

>>83055188
That's the problem. A->B tier logic can be stupid sometimes. It's a matter of mental acuity, and knowing how to keep things simple and get it right, this guy didn't get it right.

>>83055105
Would you be less angry if the poster prefixed his arguments with a statement that this is his theory and he cannot prove it? Evolutionary psychology is common sense when you accept evolution is real. It's hard to prove any particular theory within it though. His viewpoint sounds like a reasonable possibility, it just cannot be proven easily. Are you angry that someone is allowed to have a 'wrong' opinion, or just angry that the opinion is said confidently without clarification is is their theory and not proven fact?

Why are men such whiny faggots about work?
I have worked in construction, in door refurbishing services... On more social annoying jobs too, some where you need to stand all day.
None of it was particularly hard. A bit tiring but not to the extent that in itself it ruined my day. I never felt like complaining about having to go to work. It's such a piss easy deal, just clear instructions and that's all.
Meanwhile all adult men ever talk about is how much they hate working. What a fucking pathetic gender, how are the meant to be providers? They can't do anything without collapsing from exhaustion, even the simplest and most straightforward office jobs ever cause them to lose their minds. Every moids greatest dream is to not do anything. Fascinating. I am literally disabled person and would still rather kill myself than be any of those lazy moidworms.

>>83055379
I was literally the stay at home wife(male) for a few years, I even wore the dress! not a granny dress though.

but yeah idk it did get boring. hobbies and vidya and reading only last so long. obviously I did all the household chores like a good boiwife but yeah that's boring of course lul

>>83055316
Of course. Saying that would show the capacity to distinguish between a theory and a proven fact, and an awareness that he may not be right. But if he had said that, he would not be the kind of person who comes up with a theory like that.

I would not be on 4chan if I was the kind of person who can't stand "wrong" opinions, they already can't stand the liberated twitter which is tame as fuck kek.

There's definitely some truth to evolutionary pscyhology, and it does sound like a reasonable logical conclusion of accepting evolution as real. However, this is taking it too far and just going straight into making things up, and turning it into the chud equivalent of astrology. I think the fundamental misconception that he has is that he does not have an awareness of what makes it so that something is reasonably proven / likely to be true or just made up, so he just jumps to conclusions based on whatever feels right.

Like I said and like in the examples I gave, there's endless possibilities as to what could be claimed based on this kind of "evolutionary psychology".

>>83055105
Nah, its pretty accurate.

>>83055489

So is saying that fat people are freer thinkers because they are less reliant on society for food

>>83055495
That example doesn't work. Fat people is a recent phenomenon so not enough time for evolution to select for behavioral patterns. And free thinking doesn't mean more successful at passing on genes, so why should that be selected for?

>>83055539

Oh, that's a good point, definitely sounds right, but hear me out.

Very fat people may be a recent phenomenon, but fat storage sure isn't. And with very few stored fat, an evolved brain mechanism activates that says "you need these idiots to help you get some food, better align with them". More stored fat than needed does the opposite. And a lot of stored fat that was not feasible in hunter tribes, activates his mechanism in an overdrive way that makes the person just not give a fuck.

The reason for thinking freely is obvious. Someone has to lead the tribe. They will listen to someone who has the credentials for being able to reliably get food. The tribe of the guy who does this is more likely to get ahead than the tribe without him.

>>83054674
>Usually in a office there are only 2-3 people actually working, i'd wager the people who make these kinds of videos aren't these people
lel

>>83054656 (OP)
women will go to work and obey and submit their boss
but the idea of obeying and submitting to their husband...
>no i can't do that i'm a strong independent feminist woman

>>83056469
what's with the one prude in the back?

>>83054656 (OP)
You expect women to be happy about working in a warehouse instead (those who aren't lesbians, anyway)?

>>83054656 (OP)
They don't, however you underestimate how insane they will go to avoid accountability and fit in.
>The internet is fake and gay now, men are pretty much checked out but women are desperate to hop on the next trend to get likes and clicks.
>Muh Career? They usually hate their job but see it as a means to projecting themselves as strong and independent.
>even when things go wrong, they cry for the camera then try to spin it into likes and views
>>83054958
This also.
It isn't just the consensus filter though, they do it because without other's protecting them or enforcing their will, they have nothing.
Social manipulation is all they have.
Shame is the equivalent of death for them.

I wonder if their instinct for attention and approval over rides the logic that the internet is fake and gay now. They don't realize they are leaving a trail that will be archived and destroy their lives in the future.