>>83056856
I think thousands, if not mullions of women would accept that, due to poverty and what not. So long they are guaranteed basic necessities, if not more.
>>83056744 (OP)
probably because realistically slave owners will look more like immortan joe and not Khal Drogo. foids are chadsexuals only, even when enslaved
>>83056856
Sure...assuming he wants your kind of basic "sex slave who does some basic housework like a wife might do" type of thing and not like...he beats the absolute piss out of me and locks me in a cage for days on end
>>83057315
good idea anon. there's a few websites that are dedicated to hooking up rich gentlemen with sugar babies or various types of hookups or possibly even long term situations if that's your jam, btw!
>>83058529
I'm not desperate yet, but if I was I'd consider it. I'm not all that attractive though, bit overweight and not that nice facially, so not really worth making a slave. Also, what would being a slave for you look like?