>>83080650
>Anon beast stuff is just disgusting
To you.
>why
Because in my mind woman would do that because either
>she's caring
so much that she wants to take care of dog to even this knd of degree when we aren't letting dogs fuck random bitches. Being caring is desirable, feminine trait.
>she's horny
meaning she wants sex so much she would go to even these lengths, which also means she won't kill bedroom
>she's open
and it's simply fun to try out kinks every now and then
>she's submissive
submissive to the extreme, meaning she's willing submit even to beast. This is also desirable feminine trait, but I hate that people often take it as beeing some desperate doormat slave. If she submits then it means she trusts enough to give herself and in return she should be cared for. Just because you are "lower" doesn't mean you're worse. Dogs are lower than us and we still care about them and treat them as part of family. Fucking chivalry about lack of which women complain so much about was precisely virtue in submission and servitude to lord, order, people or maiden. Ideal is when both sides serve each other through care, but due to natural differences this care takes different forms, like what we commonly call care from women, and protection and wise lead from men.
In this sense, beast is merely a tool to display desirable traits.
I also like it primal and like settings of rape/monsterrape and this is close enough. I am fascinated by idea of purity and defilement, which is I'm also interested in aspects of prostitution etc. Difference is that prostitution leads to diseases and other men while beast does not. Despite being degen I also yearn for romantic monogamy. Therefore monogamous slut is ideal.
Besides dogs are worth it. They are actually useful and good. I unironically believe it's better than niggers because sex with nogs leads to niglets which are drain on society through welfare and crime. Mutilating dogs for convenience while claiming to care is hipocrisy.
