Anonymous
7/6/2025, 9:03:05 PM
No.280308623
>>280307787
>This is the first mention of that theme ITT
>>280297945 was defending sexual content by extolling its thematic value.
>>>Additionally, there is thematic or storytelling justification for virtually all of the ecchi scenes. Yes, even the toilet.
And I argued that this thematic value is overshadowed by its negative effect on the story's first and most obvious theme. You ignored this, saying it's not an argument that you personally care for, and... so fucking what? That doesn't address the argument. You elbowed into an existing argument with a think piece regarding Tsukushi's art style, of all things.
>I think
>I don't think
>I think
>I also think
This isn't your blog. You're not entitled to get pissy when someone ignores your non-argument after you ignored theirs. I think you're wrong. There! What fucking good did that do you, anon?
>This is the first mention of that theme ITT
>>280297945 was defending sexual content by extolling its thematic value.
>>>Additionally, there is thematic or storytelling justification for virtually all of the ecchi scenes. Yes, even the toilet.
And I argued that this thematic value is overshadowed by its negative effect on the story's first and most obvious theme. You ignored this, saying it's not an argument that you personally care for, and... so fucking what? That doesn't address the argument. You elbowed into an existing argument with a think piece regarding Tsukushi's art style, of all things.
>I think
>I don't think
>I think
>I also think
This isn't your blog. You're not entitled to get pissy when someone ignores your non-argument after you ignored theirs. I think you're wrong. There! What fucking good did that do you, anon?