>>33457822
>I know the deduction above is so slippery slope that almost vertical but history provedmany times that only the purest people not turn to evil under the taste of power.

Agree. With great power comes great responsibility. I don't have any airs of religiosity, nor a desire to run a cult. But 3 women tops + children, as well as those who visit seems sustainable. 3 is too unstable of a dynamic, but 4 is just right.

Not to go down a cult path, but I think another world war is inevitable (we're in one right now) and most people would prefer the security of homegrown food, vetted socializing, and the ability to go from a rural -> city environment at will. I mean, how safe are you going to be in a downtown area shooting off emails or WFH by yourself as a woman? I've been in several scenarios in my life where money doesn't matter, but the access to food and shelter was greatly appreciated.

I worked on several working weed communes in California, and I saw what mismanagement was. I mean, we're talking about crossbows, meth, and pitbulls. That's NOT what I want, and the entire workforce went on strike when we didn't get paid. Me? I'd rather pay someone who was unhappy to leave or hire them as a trusted visitor. Again, the ability to have art and socialize with likeminded weirdos is way better than rolling the dice.

And as this progresses and thrives (while working out the kinks - pun intended), I'd be happy to have people graduate and go off in the world, being a trusted network of people versus.... sending kids off to daycare or some molester-summer-camp. Not that I'd have a problem relinquishing control, but those places already have issues with power and organization.

The closest analog I can find to that was the powerlessness of most people during COVID. Me? I accidentally lived out of a van and thrived while living on Bureau of Land Management land in Colorado. I believe this is why I wasn't psychologically damaged by restrictions.