Anonymous
10/28/2025, 4:54:37 AM
No.33866440
>>33866349
>calling someone a pedophile implies attraction to children
Your reading comprehension is non-existent. I said you make pedo arguments i.e. "I should be able to have sex with minors because its natural and they did it in history". Its disgusting.
>>33866356
>says the one who chooses what standards of morality of modernity he's ok adhering to.
You literally just did the same thing. Everyone chooses their own moral standards, dipshit. That's what axioms are - circular moral argumentation that we arbitrarily choose. You also have failed to make any argument. "Well if something is natural then it must be morally correct " is not a logical argument. We call that, literally, the appeal to nature fallacy.
>calling someone a pedophile implies attraction to children
Your reading comprehension is non-existent. I said you make pedo arguments i.e. "I should be able to have sex with minors because its natural and they did it in history". Its disgusting.
>>33866356
>says the one who chooses what standards of morality of modernity he's ok adhering to.
You literally just did the same thing. Everyone chooses their own moral standards, dipshit. That's what axioms are - circular moral argumentation that we arbitrarily choose. You also have failed to make any argument. "Well if something is natural then it must be morally correct " is not a logical argument. We call that, literally, the appeal to nature fallacy.