Anonymous
11/1/2025, 5:20:22 AM
No.33882913
>>33882655
In this thread you have
>Defined love as something modern women don't offer
>Defined love as blind, eternal loyalty in form of convenant
>Modern women demand perfection, lie, cheat, age with resentment, weaponize intimacy and mock devotion
>Women are treacherous, liars, cheats and manipulators who want status, power and social proof with dominant men
> Imply women are inherently evil
> Women do not "invest" and only pick "winners"
You've tried to argue this is a species-level verdict. A statistical fact. Throughout your manifesto there is no interest in language that suggests dispensations or exceptions. I could waste my time typing rebuttals on each point but you would discard it. This is not an objective view of things nor are you looking for intellectual discussion. You want validation through rhetoric. You cannot claim the definition for love - it is an abstract and subjective concept. You point to the worst examples of women and say there's enough of them for you to cease engaging in any narrative counter to that. It's all shadow without acknowledging the light that cast it.
You have defined healing on my behalf - but I do not agree with your definition. You cannot erase a scar. You learn to live with it. You commit to move on, self aware of the cognitive and narrative damage it did to you and learning to let the ghost that haunts you slowly fade through reconciliation.
The diagnosis is incorrect because it ignores wider picture. It's similar to being presented with a picture of both good and evil in the same scene and stating with "authority" that this is a depiction of suffering. Your understanding of the picture is selective, you filter out details inconvenient to your feelings.
A balanced view is key to truth. To selectively inhale information is to be disingenous to ourselves and what could know.
Life has introduced me to bad women. But also good women. Such is life. This is the natural order of things. Absolutes are for Siths.
In this thread you have
>Defined love as something modern women don't offer
>Defined love as blind, eternal loyalty in form of convenant
>Modern women demand perfection, lie, cheat, age with resentment, weaponize intimacy and mock devotion
>Women are treacherous, liars, cheats and manipulators who want status, power and social proof with dominant men
> Imply women are inherently evil
> Women do not "invest" and only pick "winners"
You've tried to argue this is a species-level verdict. A statistical fact. Throughout your manifesto there is no interest in language that suggests dispensations or exceptions. I could waste my time typing rebuttals on each point but you would discard it. This is not an objective view of things nor are you looking for intellectual discussion. You want validation through rhetoric. You cannot claim the definition for love - it is an abstract and subjective concept. You point to the worst examples of women and say there's enough of them for you to cease engaging in any narrative counter to that. It's all shadow without acknowledging the light that cast it.
You have defined healing on my behalf - but I do not agree with your definition. You cannot erase a scar. You learn to live with it. You commit to move on, self aware of the cognitive and narrative damage it did to you and learning to let the ghost that haunts you slowly fade through reconciliation.
The diagnosis is incorrect because it ignores wider picture. It's similar to being presented with a picture of both good and evil in the same scene and stating with "authority" that this is a depiction of suffering. Your understanding of the picture is selective, you filter out details inconvenient to your feelings.
A balanced view is key to truth. To selectively inhale information is to be disingenous to ourselves and what could know.
Life has introduced me to bad women. But also good women. Such is life. This is the natural order of things. Absolutes are for Siths.