Am I going insane or did half the thread not read the fucking paper? I feel like people are spouting ancient arguments while ignoring all the new information.
I was a hardcore Nano denier until a few months ago, Bloody Mary is completely convincing, and earlier stuff about juvenile Tarbosaurus should have been cluing people into something not being right with our current: "Massive growth spurt where in a super brief time it completely changes size and shape" model of Tyrannosaurus.

Is it weird that there's a completely separate genus that looks kinda similar to how the apex predator looks as a juvenile? I guess a bit, but then look at all the different types of cats in Africa, you could probably make similar arguments.