Anonymous
6/15/2025, 1:45:42 PM
No.935805979
>>935805820
>it too obvious to miss
>I don't mistake the actual subtext for your lie.
Sure. -___-
>Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. >Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations
>This is true, and it's not an insult as much as it is an observation.
>You act like a spiteful woman
>You were, You're acting tired now.
So, repeatedly using "woman" along with "spiteful" "irrational" and "femcel" isn't using woman to insult???
>I didn't omit anything. What are you saying? I didn't specifically reference a post ITT, so it's omitted? It's here for all to see. If anything, you failed to include it up until now.
>I stand by those words. they were part of a very accurate observation.
That's 100% not what i was even talking about; When I said "omitted" I mean you omitted quotation marks (specifically to make it look like I had accidentally not used green text), if you want to know why I already said that here: >>935805629 .
>You didn't answer, and instead asked the question in the subtext of my statement back at me. It's an "are u?" instead of a "no u.".
You weren't being serious, right? you were asking if i was high. XD
>I hope you change and grow too.
Yes, and definitely you too (oh no is this just "no u").
>it too obvious to miss
>I don't mistake the actual subtext for your lie.
Sure. -___-
>Are you by any chance a woman? I know plenty or women who act just like you. >Always making things up, and jumping towards petty, irrational interpretations
>This is true, and it's not an insult as much as it is an observation.
>You act like a spiteful woman
>You were, You're acting tired now.
So, repeatedly using "woman" along with "spiteful" "irrational" and "femcel" isn't using woman to insult???
>I didn't omit anything. What are you saying? I didn't specifically reference a post ITT, so it's omitted? It's here for all to see. If anything, you failed to include it up until now.
>I stand by those words. they were part of a very accurate observation.
That's 100% not what i was even talking about; When I said "omitted" I mean you omitted quotation marks (specifically to make it look like I had accidentally not used green text), if you want to know why I already said that here: >>935805629 .
>You didn't answer, and instead asked the question in the subtext of my statement back at me. It's an "are u?" instead of a "no u.".
You weren't being serious, right? you were asking if i was high. XD
>I hope you change and grow too.
Yes, and definitely you too (oh no is this just "no u").