>>935807374
>You did. you called me a schizo, and then ignored my argument.
I responded with:"You seem a little bit schizo, also I could say "you have nothing of importance to say." about most of the things you have said (to me)." to: >>935800370 I directly responded to your claim.
>A joke. not an insult. It's funny. I could add "women often don't understand humor" meme, and it would kinda fit.
You do say: "I combined it with insults" in: >>935806082 , so doesn't it make sense for me to think that this is also an insult?
>No, I even gave a sign I was joking again.
You used ":^)" in: "Why do you need to see your own quotation marks you daft woman :^)", Can someone not use a "smiley" (or other emoticon) while insulting someone?
>You didn't answer the questions either.
which?
> I'm not trying to bring insult to you by asking, but do you have a mental condition?
More "I'm not insulting you", yeah right. -_-
>The quantitation marks don't need to be there for this. In fact, you're the only one I've seen use quotation marks like that in a long time. its weird. I kinda started to try it out myself, but it's sloppy for chatting in my honest opinion.
Quotation marks help clarify a lot of stuff.
>You cannot grasp subtlety. I would like you to change for the better, but perhaps you cannot change sue to the nature of a condition you may have.
These are not mutually exclusive terms.
So, you were hoping for the impossible???