Anonymous
6/17/2025, 6:19:08 AM
No.935882973
>>935880201
>True, but still forced intercourse is rape, no matter how you cut it.
I don't know how else to tell you, but that is just the false definition.
>If not, then the word requires redefining.
That's fine, but I don't think you're going to get far.
>It's more than sexual assault when penetration is involved, even in reverse.
>If you contest this, fine, but it is still the same act.
"it is still the same act." I agree, but as far as the law is involved that's incorrect.
>If the "law" cannot recognize that fact, then the "law" has failed.
That opinion is fine, but words don't change definition without consensus (currently the legal consensus is different from your view).
>True, but still forced intercourse is rape, no matter how you cut it.
I don't know how else to tell you, but that is just the false definition.
>If not, then the word requires redefining.
That's fine, but I don't think you're going to get far.
>It's more than sexual assault when penetration is involved, even in reverse.
>If you contest this, fine, but it is still the same act.
"it is still the same act." I agree, but as far as the law is involved that's incorrect.
>If the "law" cannot recognize that fact, then the "law" has failed.
That opinion is fine, but words don't change definition without consensus (currently the legal consensus is different from your view).