Anonymous
6/24/2025, 5:46:26 AM
No.936183478
>>936183309
>Then argument is that either every nation should have the right to develop nuclear weapons to defend themselves or none should.
But why should a nuclear country allow a non-nuclear country to develop nukes?
>If nuclear armed countries like the United States and Israel believe that countries should be prevented from developing nuclear weapons than they should offer up their own disarmament as part of the deal.
Maybe one day. But not with Iran.
>"Rules for thee but not for me" is the foundation of tyranny and unacceptable.
We're talking about whole ass countries here. It's the rule of the jungle on the world stage.
>Then argument is that either every nation should have the right to develop nuclear weapons to defend themselves or none should.
But why should a nuclear country allow a non-nuclear country to develop nukes?
>If nuclear armed countries like the United States and Israel believe that countries should be prevented from developing nuclear weapons than they should offer up their own disarmament as part of the deal.
Maybe one day. But not with Iran.
>"Rules for thee but not for me" is the foundation of tyranny and unacceptable.
We're talking about whole ass countries here. It's the rule of the jungle on the world stage.