Vicar-Devil
6/26/2025, 4:05:09 AM
No.936261873
>>936259756
With regards to IQ and evolution.
Here is my 147IQ take.
IQ can be mapped to be present throughout history in waves. it is not a dominant gene it is a recursive one. Every family line has the potential to generate a genius or a sub genius eventually. The average IQ level of a race also shifts as early learning patterns shift. IQ does not evolve through genetics, IQ is only a basic map of speed and recognition, which can be trained to be more effective in childhood, what cannot be more effective is the test which maps only certain limited data points. The data points relevant to discover IQ in a race generation are vast and demand a system that maps them with almost limitless possibility.
The systems we build with our limited understanding of IQ determine who fails and who thrives in the test. This has only worked to separate the species and as such should be abandoned. I only bring up IQ when it is relevant to the topic or when someone calls me stupid, to prove that they have a limited grasp of the situation. My actual IQ cannot be mapped. I can write a test to map IQ, but it will be flawed and will take several months to complete, at which juncture you will then be told to simply move along, because the test would only be relevant to me, you would still have features I had not accounted for and thus I only served to compare you with myself and the test can therefore only serve identicle clones of intelligence, in this deductive fashion one can see that IQ is in fact an expectation of fitness to conform, not an effective discriminator of potential.
I have assets beyond IQ which serve me well, but I also point out my flaws, what pisses me off is when people incorrectly state flaws I do not have. That I come off as retarded to some people is a direct measure of our differences and stems from emotional rebound.
With regards to IQ and evolution.
Here is my 147IQ take.
IQ can be mapped to be present throughout history in waves. it is not a dominant gene it is a recursive one. Every family line has the potential to generate a genius or a sub genius eventually. The average IQ level of a race also shifts as early learning patterns shift. IQ does not evolve through genetics, IQ is only a basic map of speed and recognition, which can be trained to be more effective in childhood, what cannot be more effective is the test which maps only certain limited data points. The data points relevant to discover IQ in a race generation are vast and demand a system that maps them with almost limitless possibility.
The systems we build with our limited understanding of IQ determine who fails and who thrives in the test. This has only worked to separate the species and as such should be abandoned. I only bring up IQ when it is relevant to the topic or when someone calls me stupid, to prove that they have a limited grasp of the situation. My actual IQ cannot be mapped. I can write a test to map IQ, but it will be flawed and will take several months to complete, at which juncture you will then be told to simply move along, because the test would only be relevant to me, you would still have features I had not accounted for and thus I only served to compare you with myself and the test can therefore only serve identicle clones of intelligence, in this deductive fashion one can see that IQ is in fact an expectation of fitness to conform, not an effective discriminator of potential.
I have assets beyond IQ which serve me well, but I also point out my flaws, what pisses me off is when people incorrectly state flaws I do not have. That I come off as retarded to some people is a direct measure of our differences and stems from emotional rebound.