Anonymous
7/3/2025, 6:33:49 AM
No.936573091
>>936572886
>projection
The fact that you're on this site means that you're the one who probably shouldn't be around kids, because I haven't seen you attack pedophiles the way I do. You' resorted to attacking the person who was calling out the pedophilia in your own thread. The counterargument was literally "yeah, but you have mentioned loli twice in a year so you're a pedophile". If I was a pedophile than looking for comments under my name would have brought up a lot more posts in regards to loli under my name considering that I namefag on a daily basis.
You are pedo enablers and you're not beating those allegations
>projection
The fact that you're on this site means that you're the one who probably shouldn't be around kids, because I haven't seen you attack pedophiles the way I do. You' resorted to attacking the person who was calling out the pedophilia in your own thread. The counterargument was literally "yeah, but you have mentioned loli twice in a year so you're a pedophile". If I was a pedophile than looking for comments under my name would have brought up a lot more posts in regards to loli under my name considering that I namefag on a daily basis.
You are pedo enablers and you're not beating those allegations