>>936623099
>BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE HAVE FIVE OR 6 KIDS SOME PEOPLE CAN ONLY HAVE ONE
Funny how we went from "I'm not an anti-natalist" to "BRO LEMME TELL YOU 'BOUT MY ANTI-NATALISM!"

>Because no-one wants to be that one, it requires some of us to not have kids at all.
Even if we accepted this pants-on-head retarded proposition seriously, you mean to tell me only death by natural causes takes human beings else they're functionally immortal? Christ-on-a-cracker! Your evil anti-natalism suddenly makes sense once we ignore both statistics and objective reality!

>I have chosen to not have kids because I can see where my lineage would be heading.
And that wasn't enough for you, so you decided to preach anti-natalism on top. Goodie goodie.

>It takes knowledge and a decent IQ to reach that conclusion.
And yet you've managed it with the double-digit IQ. Astounding.

>In just 20 generations the planet can be fucked and countries will start deploying mass causality mechanisms to stem the idiocy.
Yeah sure, in your wildest wet dream. Or how about instead we rise up and mass casualty the anti-natalists?

2/2