Anonymous
7/7/2025, 10:28:23 PM
No.936780241
>>936766085
>America is the only country with freedom of speech and no social media platform is owned by the American government so as such, freedom of speech doesn't exist on them.
You do realize that the entire point of historic public forums was to keep government overreach way from curtailing speech and the current status quo basically just means the government can put the squeeze on the social media platforms and effectively censor the modern, relevant, public forums that people use today?
The only reason why the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to social media is because people are so pig shit ignorant of their civil liberties? And, sure, while the 1st Amendment doesn't specifically say social media platforms in it's wording, it is a stone's throw away from being applicable if people had the knowledge and the will.
>Freedom of speech is a completely unique abstract-
Oh no. Without the illusion of freedom of speech the people would revolt. They have too much firepower. It is only "abstract" in the same way that "money is just paper," and yet without it things would be drastically different in very short order.
(cont.)
>America is the only country with freedom of speech and no social media platform is owned by the American government so as such, freedom of speech doesn't exist on them.
You do realize that the entire point of historic public forums was to keep government overreach way from curtailing speech and the current status quo basically just means the government can put the squeeze on the social media platforms and effectively censor the modern, relevant, public forums that people use today?
The only reason why the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to social media is because people are so pig shit ignorant of their civil liberties? And, sure, while the 1st Amendment doesn't specifically say social media platforms in it's wording, it is a stone's throw away from being applicable if people had the knowledge and the will.
>Freedom of speech is a completely unique abstract-
Oh no. Without the illusion of freedom of speech the people would revolt. They have too much firepower. It is only "abstract" in the same way that "money is just paper," and yet without it things would be drastically different in very short order.
(cont.)