Namefag
8/13/2025, 8:35:34 AM
No.938384806
>>938384600
I'm getting there, but more than likely, since clearly most of the participants in here haven't sat through any of my previous lectures, you'll have some "homework" and independant study to do before you're caaught up enough for the next lesson with more substance.
Also..
>NOU
is not a valid refute or tactic of indicative of intellectual prowess here. I called you oth to substantiate what you don't want to accept as "static" and your response is to not only NOT substantiate anything, but to try and reverse that on me. I didn't make any claims in my address... not yet kid.
[S AA 4 A]
I'm getting there, but more than likely, since clearly most of the participants in here haven't sat through any of my previous lectures, you'll have some "homework" and independant study to do before you're caaught up enough for the next lesson with more substance.
Also..
>NOU
is not a valid refute or tactic of indicative of intellectual prowess here. I called you oth to substantiate what you don't want to accept as "static" and your response is to not only NOT substantiate anything, but to try and reverse that on me. I didn't make any claims in my address... not yet kid.
[S AA 4 A]