Anonymous
8/26/2025, 12:37:05 AM
No.938961061
>>938959005
>but not the ones where you have radar lock from multiple systems, visual confirmation, and flight data showing performance beyond known craft
Where is this?
>it would be trivially confirmed and logged as “Russian jet,” “commercial flight,” or “drone.”
Or balloon. Those really gaffle them up. And they are.
>1964 Lonnie Zamora sighting in Socorro
>Conventional explanations of Zamora's claims include a lunar lander test by White Sands Missile Range and a hoax by New Mexico Tech students.
So not really evidence, huh?
>Physics is full of once-“impossible” concepts later realized in new contexts (lasers, nuclear power, gravitational waves)
Really? people thought amplified, polarized light focused into a beam was impossible? Why would they even think of something like that unless they had a need for it? And then they made it. They didn't know what they would be useful for until the tech caught up with a need for them.
>but not the ones where you have radar lock from multiple systems, visual confirmation, and flight data showing performance beyond known craft
Where is this?
>it would be trivially confirmed and logged as “Russian jet,” “commercial flight,” or “drone.”
Or balloon. Those really gaffle them up. And they are.
>1964 Lonnie Zamora sighting in Socorro
>Conventional explanations of Zamora's claims include a lunar lander test by White Sands Missile Range and a hoax by New Mexico Tech students.
So not really evidence, huh?
>Physics is full of once-“impossible” concepts later realized in new contexts (lasers, nuclear power, gravitational waves)
Really? people thought amplified, polarized light focused into a beam was impossible? Why would they even think of something like that unless they had a need for it? And then they made it. They didn't know what they would be useful for until the tech caught up with a need for them.