Anonymous
8/28/2025, 5:37:56 PM
No.939079121
>>939078882
>ad hominem (talking about cutting)
That's not an ad hominem. Ad hominem would be if I made an attempt to discredit you solely based on a petty personal attack but I havent done that. Im using it as an example to discredit the self loathing accusation because it seemed to come from someone with self harm scars, but obviously i cant tell if another anon jumps in mid convo if they dont say so.
Further your stance isnt really based on facts. There's no logical chain in your deductions. You jump from point A to point G and dont explain how you got there. On top of that you're accusing me of "pretending to be in a rational debate" while you're trying to cite 'objective facts and observations' to support your claims.
All and all just a really embarrassing display. Try harder.
>>939078896
a year? Idk its been like 3 months. im bored at work
>ad hominem (talking about cutting)
That's not an ad hominem. Ad hominem would be if I made an attempt to discredit you solely based on a petty personal attack but I havent done that. Im using it as an example to discredit the self loathing accusation because it seemed to come from someone with self harm scars, but obviously i cant tell if another anon jumps in mid convo if they dont say so.
Further your stance isnt really based on facts. There's no logical chain in your deductions. You jump from point A to point G and dont explain how you got there. On top of that you're accusing me of "pretending to be in a rational debate" while you're trying to cite 'objective facts and observations' to support your claims.
All and all just a really embarrassing display. Try harder.
>>939078896
a year? Idk its been like 3 months. im bored at work