>>942186347
>If the case proceeds to summary judgment or trial (unlikely but possible by mid-2026, assuming standard discovery timelines), the plaintiffs (Matthew Rinaudo/Mizkif and Mizkif Enterprises) have a stronger position on the merits, particularly for declaratory relief and breach of contract. The complaint alleges no actual breaches occurred and that the defendants acted without investigation, relying solely on unverified accusations—facts that, if supported by evidence, could invalidate the terminations and share repurchases under the owners' agreements. Texas law (governing via choice-of-law implications) emphasizes good faith in shareholder agreements, and courts often side with minority owners in "oppression" scenarios where ousters lack cause.

They say that it has to do with him threatening Emi via her employee and that was why they ousted him. So who ever that was will have to testify to that in court for it to be valid. Or maybe he was dumb enough to send it electronically thru text or msg. The discovery on this case (on both sides) is going to be entertainment GOLD for sure.