Anonymous
6/12/2025, 11:50:53 AM
No.148980247
>>148979571
>AI gens directly require copyrighted material in order to exist, and is already established to simultaneously be uncopyrightable AND violating Fair Use laws.
Not according to precedent set by Authors of America V Google, in which courts found Google scanning entire copyrighted books and making them searchable to be entirely within fair use. The main finding was that Google's use was "transformative", and given AI gens create their images completely from scratch via digital noise and algorithms, they're nothing if not transformative.
>AI gens directly require copyrighted material in order to exist, and is already established to simultaneously be uncopyrightable AND violating Fair Use laws.
Not according to precedent set by Authors of America V Google, in which courts found Google scanning entire copyrighted books and making them searchable to be entirely within fair use. The main finding was that Google's use was "transformative", and given AI gens create their images completely from scratch via digital noise and algorithms, they're nothing if not transformative.