Anonymous
6/12/2025, 1:32:34 PM
No.148980690
>>148980644
>Doesn't mean what the are doing is legal and by established law.
Yes it is. Disney owns the copyright and if they argue to the court that your fanart is hurting their brand, the court will side with the copyright holder. Thats why in every single copyright court case the defendant always tries to argue that his new work is derivative and separate from the original IP and therefore copyright law should not apply to them in the first place.
Fanart is not protected by any law whatsoever. Its just like streaming video games, its simply tolerated by the IP holding companies because its more beneficial than harmful to their brand. Parodies and satire are protected by law and even they lose half the court cases.
>Doesn't mean what the are doing is legal and by established law.
Yes it is. Disney owns the copyright and if they argue to the court that your fanart is hurting their brand, the court will side with the copyright holder. Thats why in every single copyright court case the defendant always tries to argue that his new work is derivative and separate from the original IP and therefore copyright law should not apply to them in the first place.
Fanart is not protected by any law whatsoever. Its just like streaming video games, its simply tolerated by the IP holding companies because its more beneficial than harmful to their brand. Parodies and satire are protected by law and even they lose half the court cases.