Anonymous
9/7/2025, 12:23:18 AM
No.150239217
>>150238654
>Good designs for most of the characters
Most of them are extremely distinct and full of heavy, unique shape language, but few of them are "good". They're some kind of mix of Panty and Stocking crossed with Spum guzzler bullshit.
>The Aesthetics and Music are both good and compliment each other
Picking good tracks that were already made by other people for other reasons is faint praise. I guess you can praise his taste in Jet Set Radio-adjacent music, but is that really a feature of the show?
>Editing is good
Basic scene transitions are fine, but the rest is sloppy as fuck.
>Animation is good when it needs to be
Except in all the parts where it's really really bad. Like Sub early 00s newgrounds bad. The good parts are the result of getting other people to do it for him, because Pan never actually learned to animate and you can tell which parts he did, because they suck. The way he talks about the "line of action" but then has the scene unfold with the most limp-dicked lifeless, weightless action really says a lot about how much he's actually tried to learn about animation in a real, tangible way. He ostensibly a cartoon reviewer and he doesn't know how to animate a hit with weight.
>The difference between the Pencils and Rotoscoping is nice world building and opens up for how other forms of animation like Claymation and CGI would work here
Schisms my 'tism actually. Rotoscoping is an animation technique, not an artstyle. He doesn't seem to know the difference between a medium, an artstyle, and an animation technique. The gimmick of having clashing artstyles battling is mostly going to be used for Gumball-styled mixed media scenes, but there will be nothing deeper about it.
>Loki is actually a pretty alright character despite Pan's terrible voice acting
He's just Pan's self insert because Pan never figured out what makes Loki an evil bad guy, despite that being his entire concept, even with decades of "work" wasted on this shit.
>Good designs for most of the characters
Most of them are extremely distinct and full of heavy, unique shape language, but few of them are "good". They're some kind of mix of Panty and Stocking crossed with Spum guzzler bullshit.
>The Aesthetics and Music are both good and compliment each other
Picking good tracks that were already made by other people for other reasons is faint praise. I guess you can praise his taste in Jet Set Radio-adjacent music, but is that really a feature of the show?
>Editing is good
Basic scene transitions are fine, but the rest is sloppy as fuck.
>Animation is good when it needs to be
Except in all the parts where it's really really bad. Like Sub early 00s newgrounds bad. The good parts are the result of getting other people to do it for him, because Pan never actually learned to animate and you can tell which parts he did, because they suck. The way he talks about the "line of action" but then has the scene unfold with the most limp-dicked lifeless, weightless action really says a lot about how much he's actually tried to learn about animation in a real, tangible way. He ostensibly a cartoon reviewer and he doesn't know how to animate a hit with weight.
>The difference between the Pencils and Rotoscoping is nice world building and opens up for how other forms of animation like Claymation and CGI would work here
Schisms my 'tism actually. Rotoscoping is an animation technique, not an artstyle. He doesn't seem to know the difference between a medium, an artstyle, and an animation technique. The gimmick of having clashing artstyles battling is mostly going to be used for Gumball-styled mixed media scenes, but there will be nothing deeper about it.
>Loki is actually a pretty alright character despite Pan's terrible voice acting
He's just Pan's self insert because Pan never figured out what makes Loki an evil bad guy, despite that being his entire concept, even with decades of "work" wasted on this shit.