>>150389669
>I am applying the same standard in with what Peter Parker/Spider-man is being categorized with regarding other Spider Men.
No, you're not, this would be like if you were arguing cartoon Peter wasn't the same as comics Peter, it's retarded.
The generalization rule is exactly for adaptations of the same character, which is what you're trying to argue for.
>The tv show Ravens are NOT Rachel Roth
She quite literally is, she is an adaptation of the character, just because at no point she says her name, we know that is her, just like we know Robin is Dick and Starfire is Kory. That is still just an adaptation of the comics character.
>like with what was seemingly decided with Spider-man we are only applying it to the specific individual
It applies to all Peters, just like how this victory applies to all Ravens.
There are no other Ravens, it's always just been the same Raven, or adaptations of her.
>>150389746
It's just some retard trying to be clever about some schizo loophole he made up.