>>150389773
>No, you're not, this would be like if you were arguing cartoon Peter wasn't the same as comics Peter, it's retarded.
No, because both use the name Peter Parker. They are both the same character, that is generalization. We are arguing AU versions, such as different spider-mans not under that human identity, same as with the Ravens that are under that human identity. You even admit this below
>She quite literally is, she is an adaptation of the character, just because at no point she says her name
We cannot determine this is the same human if they do not confirm this is Rachel, even if it is another Raven identity
>It applies to all Peters, just like how this victory applies to all Ravens.
See that is the doublethink
It applies to all SPIDER-MANS, not just all Peters, if we are saying all Ravens. Both is what they are nominated as so they go as that, or they are decided to be their human identities nominated and only that is generalized
It is either that generalization applies to all Spider-mans and Ravens, or all Peters and all Rachels. Whichever the hosts pick I want it to be consistent is all You do not just get to decide one is a different scenario because you want to campaign as them.