Anonymous
10/19/2025, 1:10:02 PM
No.150907840
>>150907783
Not really. No extant polity takes violence off the table as a solution. I think the Chatham Islanders did, before the Maori came and enslaved them, I can't think of any other historical examples.
Fascists value violence and rely on it generally because it promotes unity in the in-group by directing them against an out-group. "Effort from struggle" is, in fascist philosophy, inextricable from violence. The idea of peacefully competing ideologies is rejected in toto; violence is not just the last resort, it's the only resort of any consequence and we might as well skip straight to it and get down to business.
Not really. No extant polity takes violence off the table as a solution. I think the Chatham Islanders did, before the Maori came and enslaved them, I can't think of any other historical examples.
Fascists value violence and rely on it generally because it promotes unity in the in-group by directing them against an out-group. "Effort from struggle" is, in fascist philosophy, inextricable from violence. The idea of peacefully competing ideologies is rejected in toto; violence is not just the last resort, it's the only resort of any consequence and we might as well skip straight to it and get down to business.