Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:22:02 PM
No.150908171
>>150908117
>There is a lack of will to use violence on behalf of citizens to protect from non citizens.
I don't see the relevance to what I said, which is that no polity takes violence completely off the table. You just disagree with their decisions as to when it's appropriate.
>Violence can be separated from struggle though. This is your bias.
Violence can be separated from struggle. In fascist philosophy, violence is a part of struggle - not the only part, not necessarily involved in every facet of life - but is and must be a component. I'm not sure how many times I can restate this.
>You just are so biased you, yourself, cannot separate Fascism from violence in your mind. If you want to hate the ideology fine, but at least hate it for the right reasons instead of just parroting this moralism that doesn't even make sense because it's not even true.
I "parroted" noted extremely influential Nazi political theoretician Carl Schmitt. This is not moralism. I am describing the philosophy in the words of its own proponents. "All matters of real importance are only resolvable by force" does not miss the point of fascism, it is foundational to its intellectual principles.
Incidentally, the claim that other ideologies do the exact same and just try to shroud was ALSO most widely propagated by Schmitt. You are repeating back to me the words of the same man you claim to disagree with, filtered through however many intermediaries.
>There is a lack of will to use violence on behalf of citizens to protect from non citizens.
I don't see the relevance to what I said, which is that no polity takes violence completely off the table. You just disagree with their decisions as to when it's appropriate.
>Violence can be separated from struggle though. This is your bias.
Violence can be separated from struggle. In fascist philosophy, violence is a part of struggle - not the only part, not necessarily involved in every facet of life - but is and must be a component. I'm not sure how many times I can restate this.
>You just are so biased you, yourself, cannot separate Fascism from violence in your mind. If you want to hate the ideology fine, but at least hate it for the right reasons instead of just parroting this moralism that doesn't even make sense because it's not even true.
I "parroted" noted extremely influential Nazi political theoretician Carl Schmitt. This is not moralism. I am describing the philosophy in the words of its own proponents. "All matters of real importance are only resolvable by force" does not miss the point of fascism, it is foundational to its intellectual principles.
Incidentally, the claim that other ideologies do the exact same and just try to shroud was ALSO most widely propagated by Schmitt. You are repeating back to me the words of the same man you claim to disagree with, filtered through however many intermediaries.