Anonymous
10/19/2025, 2:37:32 PM
No.150908254
>>150908171
>no polity takes violence completely off the table
It does though for multiple issues regarding policing of laws. You can spam your rhetoric all you want but frankly, it's dishonest. You know and I know that violence is something that they do not do to enforce a multitude of things and is never even considered. For instance, BLM protests in the US would have never been allowed in 100 years ago and there would have been violence used to disperse them. As in, mass arrests leading to hangings, firing squads, or even forced labor. Now? Unthinkable. Even if the constitution explicitly says it was for the writers and their posterity and all rights in the constitution were supposed to be exclusively for them.
Same thing for other laws straight up not being enforced with violence in other nations, like how judges in Europe are super soft on migrant rapes of natives when that usually carries a huge sentence and historically people would have been fucking lynched for that.
>In fascist philosophy, violence is a part of struggle
Violence CAN be struggle, is not a part of it by default. Honestly, why even bother having this back and forth, you are so dogmatized that you just keep trying to push this point no matter how many rational points I make against it.
>I "parroted"
And why do I care about that? What is happening is that you are trying to use an appeal to authority rather than rationally coming to a conclusion right in front of you.
>This is not moralism
It is. You are the one obsessed with violence, not me, and how it's bad. I'm just saying that
1. You are incorrect that Fascism only concerns itself on modes of applying violence
2. Every mainstream ideology uses violence with the exception of ones that are explicitly pacifist, because the only way to directly defend your nation from exploitation of others is through violence
Last post, this is a waste of time. Hopefully lurkers can either criticize Fascism better or clear some of their biases about it though
>no polity takes violence completely off the table
It does though for multiple issues regarding policing of laws. You can spam your rhetoric all you want but frankly, it's dishonest. You know and I know that violence is something that they do not do to enforce a multitude of things and is never even considered. For instance, BLM protests in the US would have never been allowed in 100 years ago and there would have been violence used to disperse them. As in, mass arrests leading to hangings, firing squads, or even forced labor. Now? Unthinkable. Even if the constitution explicitly says it was for the writers and their posterity and all rights in the constitution were supposed to be exclusively for them.
Same thing for other laws straight up not being enforced with violence in other nations, like how judges in Europe are super soft on migrant rapes of natives when that usually carries a huge sentence and historically people would have been fucking lynched for that.
>In fascist philosophy, violence is a part of struggle
Violence CAN be struggle, is not a part of it by default. Honestly, why even bother having this back and forth, you are so dogmatized that you just keep trying to push this point no matter how many rational points I make against it.
>I "parroted"
And why do I care about that? What is happening is that you are trying to use an appeal to authority rather than rationally coming to a conclusion right in front of you.
>This is not moralism
It is. You are the one obsessed with violence, not me, and how it's bad. I'm just saying that
1. You are incorrect that Fascism only concerns itself on modes of applying violence
2. Every mainstream ideology uses violence with the exception of ones that are explicitly pacifist, because the only way to directly defend your nation from exploitation of others is through violence
Last post, this is a waste of time. Hopefully lurkers can either criticize Fascism better or clear some of their biases about it though