>>150908254
>Last post, this is a waste of time.
I'll choose to take this to mean you're giving me the closing statement, and will presumably read it.

I haven't said anything dishonest and I'm sure that if you're able to read over what I've said with a measure of objectivity, you'd agree. If the BLM protests had been significantly more violent, they would have been violently dispersed. Ergo, violence was not off the table - my statement. Though that you suggest mass hangings leads me to reconsider whether you're arguing in good faith.

Violence CAN be struggle, is not a part of it by default. That is correct. It is a part of it in fascist philosophy. I've attempted to rephrase this multiple times and have apparently still failed to communicate what I mean.

I do not personally think paraphrasing the words of a highly influential fascist thinker when describing fascist intellectual thought is an appeal to authority, but if you'd been willing to continue the conversation I'd have been happy to retract that and continue to describe the (identical) actual attitudes of practicing fascists.

I am not obsessed with violence. Fascism is. That was my claim. You can't refute that claim by saying "no u". Every mainstream ideology employs violence but fascism views it as a good while most western ideologies view it as a necessary evil.

Thank you for coming to my TEDx talk, have a nice day.