Anonymous
10/23/2025, 12:49:10 AM
No.150959263
>>150959161
>if veidt instead had a machine that killed all child diddlers Rorschach would love that.
Eh, idk. I think Rorschach doesn't like scheme-y plots involving mass murder in general, even if they are of bad people.
Rorschach seems to really value the law. Even though he himself is a criminal vigilante.
I think he turned a blind eye to what the Comedian did in Vietnam, or what Truman did in Japan.
In those cases they were military operations given legal approval by congress, okayed by the president, and if people are against it, they can achieve justice for said action with their vote.
Ozymandias unilaterally decides to kill people for what he believes is for the better good.
Did anyone decide Ozymandias should have this power? No. No one but Ozy himself.
Is there a way for the people to bring Ozy to justice? Not unless he is stopped.
Even though he's a hypocrite, it seems he's the only superhero in Watchmen who is also concerned with 'who watches the watchmen.'
>if veidt instead had a machine that killed all child diddlers Rorschach would love that.
Eh, idk. I think Rorschach doesn't like scheme-y plots involving mass murder in general, even if they are of bad people.
Rorschach seems to really value the law. Even though he himself is a criminal vigilante.
I think he turned a blind eye to what the Comedian did in Vietnam, or what Truman did in Japan.
In those cases they were military operations given legal approval by congress, okayed by the president, and if people are against it, they can achieve justice for said action with their vote.
Ozymandias unilaterally decides to kill people for what he believes is for the better good.
Did anyone decide Ozymandias should have this power? No. No one but Ozy himself.
Is there a way for the people to bring Ozy to justice? Not unless he is stopped.
Even though he's a hypocrite, it seems he's the only superhero in Watchmen who is also concerned with 'who watches the watchmen.'