>>11336617
>>11336592

If you want to be autistic about this, at that size tank rounds are more akin to being shot by a pistol. So, no, very much not nuke proof. You'd need to get quite a bit bigger than that to survive an atom bomb let alone survive it unscathed. Just because they are durable enough to withstand the square cube law would at most mean roughly equivalent to steel in terms of durability, maybe tungsten. However, they aren't going to suddenly gain the same durability as depleted uranium until they are quite a bit bigger. After all, we can still blow up a blue whale quite easily and those are much bigger than merely 30-50 feet. Obviously not a perfect comparison as the water helps with the issues of weight, but the point still stands.

If she was more in the range of 50 meters however, maybe...And 100? Certainly.