>>11342288
My bad, the formatting was messy.
When I wrote:
> 1.50 - 3.5 heads taller - reference person's head just above navel

I meant:
- 1.50 = female:male height ratio (she’s 150% his height)
- 3.5 heads = visual aid for scale
- "Head above navel" = another way to picture it

my bad, wrote it very unclear. at least you got an image

>>11342318
>measurements are useless

yea, ratios sidestep the ambiguity of absolute sizes, which you often can't infer in any way from the images, and focus on what's the core topic of 'mini giantess' - human interaction