>>11346054
anon, i think you should've formatted the artist names to be on the same line... this post is taller than my screen, and i'm on a 1080p monitor... i didn't even know 4chan lets you submit posts this tall... but, i recognize honeybread!!! the smegma in this sequence by them lives rent-free in my mind:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=8079768
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=8079779

i guess zooming into it, it does look possible to do without drawing skill or experience, especially because the foreskin only allows so much opportunity to depict smegma, anyway. unless you just do what some artists do and put smegma on the outside of the foreskin entirely, like another of the artists you listed (Dama Shipwreck) did here:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9101980

but, i'm sorry, i really don't see how someone like angelauxes's smegma can be on the same level of difficulty as mamimi's. maybe i'm ust not familiar with their stuff, so across the board it can be layered and have complex lighting and mass and such. but i linked examples of what i hoped to do (again, namely the 2nd in the sequence i linked for it being zoomed-into the smegma):
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=6324718

and i would say there was literally no attempt whatsoever to make the smegma look 3D. there is some lighting on the underside of the dick to signify it being in the shadow, but that's it. compare to literally any angelauxes smegma (2nd is older, but doesn't have the VHS filter):
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=11243618
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4692417

it's clearly 3D, and is in huge clumps as if it's a literal cake. it's literally so 3D that it's unironically dripping. i just don't see the comparison at all
>Cleaning up AI gens is something else fairly easy, also practical.
ah, well, i am interested in doing that, since it's all i plan to edit. so with that in mind, perhaps i'd try