Anonymous
7/31/2025, 1:25:12 PM
No.11346123
>>11346101
>it's 56 lines,
I'm just so used to using my phone that scroll down on the post wasn't something I considered a problem.
I used to write stories on my phone also, and did some programming, so reading only sections at a time is what I'm used to
But if I make any lists in the future, I'll make them horizontal
>drawing 2D shapes must be easier than drawing 3D shapes
Well it's all 2D, depth is an illusion and there is still depth in the flat drawing. I pointed that out in the second video (you'd have to pause to read it), that the shape of the smegma stranda change due to the curvature of the penis. They are ellipse shaped near the centre and teardrop shaped near the edges (where it's started to round and so the mound in the centre obscures the tail)
You could maybe get away with making the smegma look flat in an overall more flat style (it would look odd, like in my first vid, but not too noticeable) still you would want to consider the 3D shape of things to a degree
>i didn't even realize you edited anything
I should have put them wide by side
The shading on the upper breasts just looks odd since there's no reason (based on where the light in the scene is coming from) for there to be shadow there. A better way to het that same sort of effect may be to put more highlighting on the breasts, or you could add some texturing to the image overall as more "dirty" art styles will do this sort of random splotches that don't really make sense but can be appealing
Lighting is something AI still seems to mess up fairly regularly. It does depend on style, but typically you put the highlights on the highest point. So the double light on the breasts may also be wrong, unless it's meant to bulge in the middle, although long highlights can give the skin an oily look. The lighting along the shaft would also mean the whole thing is wrinkled
AI puts an equal amount of detail everywhere, and sometimes you may want to reduce some details to draw focus to others
>it's 56 lines,
I'm just so used to using my phone that scroll down on the post wasn't something I considered a problem.
I used to write stories on my phone also, and did some programming, so reading only sections at a time is what I'm used to
But if I make any lists in the future, I'll make them horizontal
>drawing 2D shapes must be easier than drawing 3D shapes
Well it's all 2D, depth is an illusion and there is still depth in the flat drawing. I pointed that out in the second video (you'd have to pause to read it), that the shape of the smegma stranda change due to the curvature of the penis. They are ellipse shaped near the centre and teardrop shaped near the edges (where it's started to round and so the mound in the centre obscures the tail)
You could maybe get away with making the smegma look flat in an overall more flat style (it would look odd, like in my first vid, but not too noticeable) still you would want to consider the 3D shape of things to a degree
>i didn't even realize you edited anything
I should have put them wide by side
The shading on the upper breasts just looks odd since there's no reason (based on where the light in the scene is coming from) for there to be shadow there. A better way to het that same sort of effect may be to put more highlighting on the breasts, or you could add some texturing to the image overall as more "dirty" art styles will do this sort of random splotches that don't really make sense but can be appealing
Lighting is something AI still seems to mess up fairly regularly. It does depend on style, but typically you put the highlights on the highest point. So the double light on the breasts may also be wrong, unless it's meant to bulge in the middle, although long highlights can give the skin an oily look. The lighting along the shaft would also mean the whole thing is wrinkled
AI puts an equal amount of detail everywhere, and sometimes you may want to reduce some details to draw focus to others